TPC Journal Volume 11 Issue 2

258 The Professional Counselor | Volume 11, Issue 2 Table 3 Results From Moderation Path Analysis Variable β SE LLCI ULCI SBRS 0.242* 0.115 0.015 0.469 Coping 0.718*** 0.062 0.596 0.841 SBRS × Coping 0.017** 0.006 0.006 0.029 Controlled Variables Age −1.420 1.215 −3.811 0.971 Gender −0.681 1.297 −3.232 1.871 Education −1.409 1.287 −3.942 1.124 Sexual Identity 0.185 1.304 −2.380 2.750 Help-Seeking 0.070 1.282 −2.452 2.592 SBRS 0.577*** 0.089 0.403 0.751 Resilience 0.443*** 0.029 0.387 0.499 SBRS × Resilience 0.001 0.004 −0.006 0.009 Controlled Variables Age 0.472 1.109 −1.709 2.654 Gender −1.704 1.175 −4.015 0.607 Education -0.084 1.174 −2.227 2.395 Sexual Identity −2.569* 1.184 −4.899 −0.239 Help-Seeking 1.542 1.138 −0.696 3.781 Note. SBRS = Subtle and Blatant Racism Scale; LLCI = lower limit of confidence interval; ULCI = upper limit of confidence interval. * p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001. Supplementary Analyses Because the 14 coping subscales demonstrated poor reliability, we examined which types of coping strategies moderated the link between racism and stress-related growth. Among the different types of coping responses, self-blame, religion, humor, venting, substance use, denial, and behavioral disengagement had significant moderation effects on the relation between racism and stress-related growth. On the contrary, self-distraction, active coping, use of emotional support, use of instrumental support, positive reframing, planning, and acceptance did not significantly moderate the relationship between racism and stress-related growth.