196 The Professional Counselor | Volume 12, Issue 3 Conflict of Interest and Funding Disclosure The authors reported no conflict of interest or funding contributions for the development of this manuscript. References American Counseling Association. (2014). ACA code of ethics. Arczynski, A. V., & Morrow, S. L. (2017). The complexities of power in feminist multicultural psychotherapy supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000179 Association for Counselor Education and Supervision Taskforce on Best Practices in Clinical Supervision. (2011, April). Best practices in clinical supervision. https://acesonline.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ ACES-Best-Practices-in-Clinical-Supervision-2011.pdf Baggerly, J., Tan, T. X., Pichotta, D., & Warner, A. (2017). Race, ethnicity, and gender of faculty members in APA‐ and CACREP‐accredited programs: Changes over five decades. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 45(4), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12079 Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). Pearson. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press. Brown, L. S. (1994). Subversive dialogues: Theory in feminist therapy. Basic Books. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge. Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. (2015). 2016 CACREP standards. https://www.cacrep.org/for-programs/2016-cacrep-standards Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364 Dickens, K. N., Ebrahim, C. H., & Herlihy, B. (2016). Counselor education doctoral students’ experiences with multiple roles and relationships. Counselor Education and Supervision, 55(4), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12051 Englander, M. (2012). The interview: Data collection in descriptive phenomenological human scientific research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43(1), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916212X632943 Evans, K. M., Kincade, E. A., Marbley, A. F., & Seem, S. R. (2005). Feminism and feminist therapy: Lessons from the past and hopes for the future. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83(3), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2005.tb00342.x Green, M. S., & Dekkers, T. D. (2010). Attending to power and diversity in supervision: An exploration of supervisee learning outcomes and satisfaction with supervision. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 22(4), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2010.528703 Keltner, D. (2016). The power paradox: How we gain and lose influence. Penguin. Lloyd, M. (2013). Power, politics, domination, and oppression. In G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola, & S. Laurel Weldon (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender and politics (pp. 111–134). Oxford University Press. Mangione, L., Mears, G., Vincent, W., & Hawes, S. (2011). The supervisory relationship when women supervise women: An exploratory study of power, reflexivity, collaboration, and authenticity. The Clinical Supervisor, 30(2), 141–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2011.604272 McWhirter, E. H. (1994). Counseling for empowerment. American Counseling Association. Miller, J. B. (2008). Telling the truth about power. Women & Therapy, 31(2–4), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703140802146282 Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE. Murphy, M. J., & Wright, D. W. (2005). Supervisees’ perspectives of power use in supervision. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(3), 283–295.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01569.x
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDU5MTM1