The Professional Counselor | Volume 14, Issue 2 127 Table 3 Bivariate Correlations for Defending Behavior and the Five Steps of the Bystander Intervention Model Measure 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Defending Behavior __ 2. Notice the Event .31** __ 3. Interpret as an Emergency .04 .09 __ 4. Accept Responsibility .23* .11 .30** __ 5. Know How to Act .26* −.07 .01 .67** __ 6. Decision to Intervene .38** .11 .29** .56** .63** __ *p < .05, **p < .01. Table 4 Summary of Linear Multiple Regression Analyses for the Five Steps of the Bystander Intervention Model Variable B SE B β t(73) 95% CI Notice the Event .20 .07 .29** 2.70 [.05, .35] Interpret as an Emergency −.10 .15 −.08 −0.68 [−.40, .20] Accept Responsibility −.02 .14 −.02 −0.12 [−.29, .25] Know How to Act .08 .16 .08 0.49 [−.25, .41] Decision to Intervene .27 .12 .33* 2.30 [.04, .50] Note. SE = standard error, CI = confidence interval. *p < .05, **p < .01. Figure 1 Means for Notice the Event by Time and Bystander Status Note. Simple slopes are shown depicting the direction and degree of the significant interaction testing moderator effects (p = .001). Bystanders reported an increase in Notice the Event and non-bystanders reported a decrease in Notice the Event.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDU5MTM1