Using Photovoice to Explore the Role of Self-Compassion in Mothers Post–COVID-19 Pandemic

Kelly Emelianchik-Key, Adriana C. Labarta, Clara Bossie, Carman S. Gill

Self-compassion, or the ability to show oneself kindness in challenging situations, has various advantages for mental well-being and psychological health, encompassing three interrelated elements: self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness. Mothers are an often-overlooked population who face numerous mental health challenges because of socially constructed ideals of motherhood. Therefore, mothers may encounter obstacles in developing self-compassion amid the demands of motherhood, related societal pressures, and other contextual factors, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This research study utilized a photovoice methodology to investigate how mothers with children ages 5 to 12 experience self-compassion post–COVID-19 pandemic. The findings revealed four main themes with 13 subthemes, illustrating the distinct challenges and benefits associated with self-compassion for mothers. The authors conclude with implications for counseling, including the need for interventions that promote self-compassion and wellness for mothers from culturally and racially diverse communities.

Keywords: mothers, motherhood, self-compassion, photovoice, wellness

Intensive mothering, a term coined by Hays (1996), refers to the socially constructed expectation of motherhood that a mother must meet unrealistic standards to be deemed a good mother. Although societal roles have evolved over the past 30 years, with many mothers working full-time, the unrealistic ideal of motherhood has remained unchanged (Chae, 2014; Forbes et al., 2020; Lamar et al., 2019; Prikhidko & Swank, 2018). Intensive mothering demands that mothers be the central, self-sacrificing caregivers who devote extensive time, energy, and resources to their children’s needs (Hays, 1996). Forbes et al. (2021) asserted that the fact that “the expectations of mothers remain primarily unchanged despite advances made in gender equality in the U.S. as a result of feminist critiques suggests the expectations of mothers are deeply engrained in the fabric of society” (p. 271).

Research indicates that mothers from diverse backgrounds (e.g., race, ethnicity, social class, job status) endorse unrealistic beliefs about intensive mothering (Forbes et al., 2020), though cultural ideals, lack of resources, and structural barriers could impact the extent to which diverse communities endorse intensive mothering (Lankes, 2022). Living up to intensive mothering standards causes mothers to put children (and often the whole family) before their own mental and physical health (Elliot et al., 2015). Mothers who cannot live up to this ideal often face physical and mental health consequences, such as exhaustion, overwhelming anxiety, feelings of isolation and inadequacy, identity challenges and loss of self, self-criticism, and shame and guilt (Forbes et al., 2021; Prikhidko & Swank, 2018). They are also more likely to experience depression, anxiety, and decreased life satisfaction (Forbes et al., 2020; Prikhidko & Swank, 2018).

These pressures may lead mothers to engage in counseling to seek support, build realistic expectations, develop coping skills, and create a working family system that relies on more than one person to meet the needs of a child. Wellness, a cornerstone for effective counseling practice, focuses on the optimal health and well-being of the mind, body, and spirit, allowing individuals to live life more fully (Myers & Sweeney, 2004; Neff & Germer, 2013). Relatedly, maternal health strategies help support the physical, emotional, and mental health of mothers (Mitchell et al., 2018). Research suggests that mothers may benefit from focusing less on developing coping skills and more on developing maternal wellness strategies, such as having a plan and asking for help, which can impact the overall family system and functioning (Currie, 2018). The body of research on maternal wellness promotion in the counseling literature is not extensive, and there is a notable gap in empirical studies investigating how mothers’ well-being has been affected in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Dual Roles of Motherhood Post-Pandemic
     The COVID-19 outbreak was declared a pandemic in early March 2020. In late 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported approximately 4.5 million deaths, with over 650,000 deaths in the United States alone (WHO, 2021). The COVID-19 pandemic’s impact ranged from being a manageable inconvenience for some to causing severe loss of lives and livelihoods for others, cutting across class, ethnic, and national boundaries (Park, 2021). As the COVID-19 pandemic became an inevitable daily reality, it increasingly highlighted pre-existing social disparities, including limited access to health care and education, which disproportionately affect marginalized communities. This was evident in the higher rates of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths among these groups (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2020).

In a society already emphasizing intensive mothering, COVID-19 worsened gender inequalities, forcing women to take on additional home and childcare responsibilities, including homeschooling. More women left jobs because of these role changes (Alon et al., 2020; Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2021) and experienced higher rates of exhaustion, anxiety, and depression (Davenport et al., 2020; Grose, 2021). According to Grose’s (2021) article in The New York Times, 69% of mothers reported adverse health effects from COVID-19 pandemic–related stress, compared to 51% of fathers. The pandemic also intensified job disparities, with women facing more job losses and slower recovery than men, pre– and post–COVID-19 pandemic (Lofton et al., 2021). In dual-income households, mothers assumed greater childcare responsibilities than fathers, a trend that persisted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic (Zamarro et al., 2020). Hupkau and Petrongolo (2020) predicted that an unequal division of labor will perpetuate inequalities in parental roles. Although remote work allows women to balance work and family, it can dilute their workplace presence and negatively impact their careers. Increased domestic labor has led to worsening emotional and financial health for U.S. mothers (Bahn et al., 2020; Ruppanner et al., 2021). Therefore, addressing the intersection of motherhood and mental health is crucial for effectively addressing the post–COVID-19 pandemic impact.

Self-Compassion and Motherhood
     Given the prevalent challenges that mothers faced before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic, counselors need evidence-based approaches to promote wellness in community and clinical settings. Self-compassion comprises three dichotomous yet related components: mindfulness versus overidentification, common humanity versus isolation, and self-kindness versus self-judgment (Neff & Germer, 2013). Mindfulness is an evidence-based approach that entails nonjudgment and accepting one’s experiences rather than overidentifying or suppressing emotions (Neff, 2011). Common humanity describes the interconnectedness of the human experience and allows individuals to recognize pain and failure as universal struggles. Finally, self-kindness requires treating oneself with kindness, support, and understanding rather than engaging in self-criticism in response to life’s challenges (Neff, 2011).

Research has consistently linked lower levels of self-compassion with a range of mental health issues, including depression and anxiety (Han & Kim, 2023; Neff, 2011). As such, self-compassion may represent a powerful wellness construct because of its effectiveness in treating mental health concerns like anxiety, depression, stress, eating concerns, rumination, and self-criticism (Ferrari et al., 2019). Self-compassion may also represent an effective coping mechanism for mothers experiencing post-traumatic stress symptoms after childbirth (Mitchell et al., 2018), postpartum depression (Fonseca & Canavarro, 2018), and insecure attachment and parenting stress (Moreira et al., 2015; Neff, 2011). Furthermore, self-compassion may help mothers increase mental health, mindful parenting (Moreira et al., 2015; Neff, 2011), and the “ability to respond to the challenges of parenting in ways that are more sensitive and resilient” (Psychogiou et al., 2016, p. 897). Beyond individual benefits, emerging research has considered the intergenerational impacts of self-compassion (Carbonneau et al., 2020; Lathren et al., 2020). Mothers with greater self-compassion may better tolerate difficult emotions through kindness and nonjudgment, thereby better supporting their children in navigating distressing emotional experiences (Lathren et al., 2020).

Present Study

Because of the potential for new roles, increased responsibilities, and decreased support during and post–COVID-19 pandemic, mothers are at greater risk for mental health concerns (Bahn et al., 2020; Ruppanner et al., 2021). We believe that self-compassion is a promising tool for wellness-based counseling with mothers. Although the previous examples presented in our literature review reflected a few benefits of this practice, we sought to further explore the role and impact of self-compassion in mothers’ lives post–COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we utilized photovoice, a method within community-based participatory research (CBPR) that draws on feminist theory, in order to better understand, empower, raise consciousness, create dialogue, and produce social change on behalf of mothers struggling with mental health and wellness post–COVID-19 pandemic (Wang, 1999; Wang & Burris, 1997).

Method

Grounded in feminism, critical pedagogy, and photography (Wang & Burris, 1997), photovoice is one of several qualitative research methods in CBPR that allows individuals to express their beliefs about community and social issues using photos and personal descriptions. This robust methodology promotes social action, diversity, and advocacy within communities (Smith et al., 2010; Wang & Burris, 1997). Photovoice assumes that participants are the experts in their own lives, with the research process involving three unique components: (a) facilitating a partnership within the community, developing a research question, and training; (b) reflecting on the images, adhering to critical pedagogy while using a structured analytical framework consisting of five questions, called SHOWeD, to guide the analysis and promote meaningful change; and (c) disseminating the findings within the community (Wang & Burris, 1997).

In counseling, photovoice has the power to promote critical ideologies and reflective dialogue that allows for the constructivist creation of meaning around a social construct, promoting social justice and advocacy within the community (Sackett & Jenkins, 2015; Wester et al., 2021). Additionally, research demonstrates that photovoice fosters team building, social skills, self-efficacy, social connectedness, friendship, empowerment, and a sense of community (Wang & Burris, 1997; Wilson et al., 2007). Scholars in the counseling profession have called for the use of photovoice to promote community and advocacy and investigate interventions for issues that inhibit client growth (Sackett & Jenkins, 2015). Because of this call, the strong ties to critical pedagogy, and the underpinnings of feminist theory, we used a photovoice methodology to explore the following research question: How do mothers in our community understand, experience, and enact self-compassion in their daily lives in a post–COVID-19 pandemic world?

Participants
     For the present study, the inclusion criteria indicated that participants must (a) be 18 years of age or older, (b) have no history of a personality disorder diagnosis and no severe symptoms of mental illness (e.g., suicidal ideation or psychosis), and (c) have at least one child in the home between the ages of 5 and 12. The rationale for selecting this age range was based on neurological data demonstrating differences in brain development for children over 5 (van der Kolk, 2014) and in Erikson’s psychosocial stages of development that document differences in individuals over 12 (Orenstein & Lewis, 2021). Our target sample size was eight to 12 participants, which was determined based on the standard for photovoice methodology (Wang & Burris, 1997), but additionally, the goal was to capture the depth and breadth of each individual analysis.

After excluding participants who did not complete the study or follow the study guidelines, the final sample consisted of eight women aged 30 to 42 (M = 37.25). Seven participants self-identified as White/Caucasian; one identified as Asian and White/Caucasian. All eight participants indicated that they were married. Participants were asked about their employment status and were given the option to select all applicable options. Five participants selected part-time employment, three marked stay-at-home parent, one indicated being employed full-time, and one indicated being self-employed. Regarding education level, four participants reported earning a bachelor’s degree or higher, two reported completing some college, one reported completing trade school, and one declined to respond. Lastly, concerning mental health concerns, two participants reported struggling with anxiety and depression, one reported struggling with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms, three declined to respond, and two denied any mental health concerns.

Procedure
     After receiving IRB approval, we collaborated with two local community mental health agencies, including one nonprofit agency and one for-profit agency. These community-based mental health agencies allowed us to advertise and recruit mothers who met the criteria and demonstrated interest in this research. We shared electronic flyers via social media with the study information, including the design, purpose, and participant expectations (i.e., taking photos and discussing the meaning behind them in focus groups). We also provided a small allotment to compensate for participants’ costs, such as internet or cell phone data use. The for-profit agency also offered free self-compassion books to all participants who completed the study. Participants could receive this resource by providing their email addresses after their final interview.

After completing an informed consent form, each participant participated in a 45–60-minute psychoeducational focus group led by one or more members of our research team, where they learned the basic components of self-compassion (i.e., self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness) and engaged in discussions about self-compassion with other group members. These psychoeducational groups consisted of two to four participants because of the scheduling needs of participants. Our overarching research question for the study was shared and we engaged in dialogue about changes experienced because of the COVID-19 pandemic. At the end of the session, we provided participants with information about taking photos, directions, and information to assist in maintaining confidentiality (e.g., avoid taking photos of self or others to protect confidentiality). The participants had 10 days to take or select photos to visually describe self-compassion in their own lives. Following, each participant was asked to caption them with a title, respond to the SHOWeD questions, which are unique to the methodology, and send them to us via email. The SHOWeD questions consisted of the following: 1) What do you see in the photo? 2) What is happening in your photograph? 3) How does this photo capture self-compassion in your own life? 4) Why does this photo contribute to the challenge, concern, or strengths that exist in self-compassion? and 5) What can mental health professionals or others do to help foster and support self-compassion in mothers? (Wang & Burris, 1997).

Each participant completed a follow-up photovoice session in which we placed participants’ top two selected photos on a slideshow with their corresponding captions. We followed outlined guidelines for the second photovoice session (Wang & Burris, 1997; Wester et al., 2021) while focusing on the two photos each participant selected, which were used to establish themes. Most of the second photovoice sessions were held individually to give mothers more scheduling flexibility and prevent further attrition. Although these in-depth, semi-structured interviews were individual, participants were encouraged to engage in dialogue with our research team regarding other participants’ photos and captions in order to create shared meaning. Once the meeting ended, we transcribed the entire discussion while focusing on the participants’ meaning of the photos.

Data Analysis
     This study used photovoice, a methodology within CBPR (Wang, 1999; Wang & Burris, 1997), and interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to explore participants’ experiences within interview transcripts and photographs (Burton et al., 2017; Griffin & May, 2012). The study emphasized collaboration between researchers and community members throughout the research process, from defining research questions to disseminating findings. This approach ensured the research was relevant to and beneficial for the community it aimed to serve. The feminist framework underpinned the entire process, influencing the focus on gender issues and power dynamics, emphasizing participants’ voices and lived experiences, and promoting social change and empowerment (Wang, 1999). IPA was utilized as the primary analytical approach, aligning with the study’s aim to explore how participants make sense of their experiences (Burton et al., 2017). Participants were viewed as experts in their own experiences, and the analysis focused on understanding their perspectives.

Following the IPA procedures of Griffin and May (2012), the analysis began with thorough familiarization with the data, followed by initial coding, developing emergent themes, searching for connections, and looking for patterns across cases. Recurring patterns and key concepts were identified in each transcript, photo, and responses to the SHOWeD questions. Relationships between themes found in the written dialogue and patterns in photos were extracted, always keeping in mind the true meaning expressed by the participants. We engaged in a double hermeneutic process, interpreting the participants’ interpretations of their experiences. Interpretive themes were developed to analyze deeper meaning. All four of us met weekly during the coding process to discuss each step and reach a consensus before moving on to each next step (Larkin & Thompson, 2011).

Role of the Researcher and Trustworthiness
     Trustworthiness is critical in qualitative research. To promote transparency as the research team, we identified our backgrounds and identities, which could impact the study (Creswell, 2020). Our team consisted of four members: three coders and one auditor. Kelly Emelianchik-Key (associate professor), Adriana C. Labarta (assistant professor), and Carman S. Gill (full professor) served as coders and were all counselor educators at Florida Atlantic University during the research process. They are each licensed mental health counselors, National Certified Counselors, and Approved Clinical Supervisors; Emelianchik-Key is also a licensed marriage and family therapist. Emelianchik-Key and Gill identify as White females and Labarta identifies as Latina. Emelianchik-Key also identifies as a mother, which was a critical piece of the study and important to consider to prevent bias. The auditor, Clara Bossie, is a White female and a counselor education doctoral student at Florida Atlantic University; she is a licensed marriage and family therapist with specialized training in dialectical behavioral therapy and as a Mindful Self-Compassion (MSC) teacher. She is also the owner and clinical director of a private practice.

Emelianchik-Key, Labarta, and Gill have extensive experience in qualitative research and coded the data, while Bossie served as an external auditor because of her specialized MSC training in order to provide additional perspectives and feedback, enhancing trustworthiness (Creswell & Báez, 2020). As a team, we discussed biases and assumptions throughout the research and data analysis process, maintaining an audit trail. Peer validation was used to promote trustworthiness (Larkin & Thompson, 2011) while noting intersectionality and privilege within the team. Member checking was conducted after developing the final themes, with participants providing feedback. No objections were raised, and two of the participants responded noting they agreed with the results.

Results

The findings that emerged from the discussion of the SHOWeD questions, participant photos, and corresponding captions included four overarching themes with 13 subthemes. Theme 1, Challenges With Self-Compassion, included subthemes Permission and Justification, Making Time, Self-Worth, and Understanding Self-Compassion. Theme 2, Isolation Versus Common Humanity, included subthemes Social Media, Desire for Connection, and Self-Criticism. Theme 3, Awareness and Education, included the subthemes Self-Awareness, Acknowledgment From Self and Others, and Psychoeducation. Theme 4, Mindfulness, included subthemes Open Awareness, One-Pointed Awareness, and Tactile Experiences.

Theme 1: Challenges With Self-Compassion
     The initial theme revolved around mothers’ obstacles and difficulties with integrating self-compassion into their daily lives. These challenges encompassed permission giving, allocating time, grappling with feelings of self-worth, and distinguishing between self-compassion and self-care. The subtheme of Permission and Justification encompassed the hurdles mothers encounter when attempting to incorporate self-compassion into their lives. A common rationale for practicing self-compassion was the significant impact it may have on their children and families. Mothers expressed challenges with practicing self-compassion “just because” and sought justifications for their practice. The second subtheme of Making Time underscored the challenge of making time for self-compassion amid juggling various roles and responsibilities as a mother. Moreover, this subtheme emerged during our study because of the difficulty in finding mothers to participate amidst their many demands. Rather than making time for themselves, mothers described examples of wedging acts of self-compassion into everyday activities, such as morning coffee and reflective moments in the car during Little League practice.

The third subtheme of Self-Worth underscored mothers’ difficulties in recognizing their value, particularly as they navigate societal and familial expectations of the “perfect” mother. Participants expressed sentiments of needing to validate or “prove” their worthiness. The last subtheme of Understanding Self-Compassion shed light on the difficulty of discerning between self-care and self-compassion. Participants frequently equated self-care activities with self-compassion, failing to distinguish between them and often neglecting their needs. The self-compassion practices described by participants were not entirely directed toward their well-being, as evidenced by self-care activities and compassion practices that primarily sought to extend warmth and kindness to others rather than focusing on themselves. Examples from these subthemes are in Table 1.

Table 1

Participant Quotes Related to Subthemes of Theme 1: Challenges With Self-Compassion

Subthemes Participant Quote
Permission and Justification Participant 3: “It’s been really important for me to find time for myself to do things that I want to do. But then I feel like sometimes, as a mom, you feel like everything revolves around your family, and then, when you take time away from that, it’s like you’re being selfish.”
Making Time Participant 2: “It’s hard to remember sometimes when you’re on autopilot. Yeah, or things happen like one after another, and then you don’t have that awareness right away sometimes.”
Self-Worth Participant 3: “I feel like I’m always trying to prove that what I do is important. And it’s not only proving that to other people, but I need to feel it myself.”
Understanding Self-Compassion Participant 1: “I think even like understanding self-compassion can be kind of strange, because nowadays it’s self-care. Everyone calls it ‛self-care.’ It seems like just everyone is getting their nails done or paying for expensive facials, or whatever, because it’s self-care. I think that’s kind of more of like a superficial thing, where self-compassion is more internal . . . you have to like, you know, be self-aware to know how to be self-compassionate.”

 

Theme 2: Isolation Versus Common Humanity
     The second theme highlighted one of the central components of the self-compassion model: Isolation Versus Common Humanity (Germer & Neff, 2019; Neff & Germer, 2013). This theme showcased the contrast between participants’ longing for connection while engaging in behaviors that fostered disconnection. The first subtheme was Social Media, including its positive and negative impacts. A significant aspect was the experience of social comparisons, which either provided participants with understanding and validation or left them feeling isolated and separate from others, resulting in self-criticism. Social media had both helpful and harmful influences on participants’ well-being.

The second subtheme of Desire for Connection reflected participants’ deep longing to connect with others and to feel heard, valued, and acknowledged for their efforts. This is especially true when navigating parenting challenges to avoid feelings of isolation. The last subtheme was Self-Criticism. Self-criticism captured instances in which mothers engaged in or exhibited self-critical language. Participants frequently engaged in cognitive distortions such as overgeneralizing, ruminating on “should haves,” and making self-judgments. This tendency toward self-criticism often led to narratives and expressions of isolation or feeling excluded from a group or family. Participant quotes for each of these subthemes are found in Table 2.

Table 2 

Participant Quotes Related to Subthemes of Theme 2: Isolation Versus Common Humanity

Subthemes Participant Quote
Social Media Participant 2: “I think the reason self-compassion isn’t as popular is because a lot of the mainstream help we easily come across makes a profit on people feeling like they’re not good enough. Self-compassion doesn’t count on people needing to take a big action to make a change in their lives.”
Desire for Connection Participant 5: “The overall experience was good. . . . It’s always nice to hear that you’re not the only person juggling a thousand things and trying to make sense of it.”
Self-Criticism Participant 6: “Sometimes we all feel like we’re alone in the things that we’re doing and the things that we’re dealing with because we can’t feel like we can talk about it cause then we’re a failure. And that’s like one of the biggest things for moms.”

 

Theme 3: Awareness and Education
     The third theme encapsulated participants’ journey toward cultivating heightened self-awareness regarding the importance of self-compassion, alongside a plea for counselors to provide enhanced education and incorporate strengths-based, empowering approaches for mothers. The first subtheme of Self-Awareness involved participants recognizing the significance of self-compassion and their ability to prioritize time for engaging in self-compassion and self-care. Participants acknowledged that seeking help is permissible and that the shaming associated with being unable to manage everything should not occur. The second subtheme of Acknowledgment From Self and Others centered around the desire to be recognized and valued for their many roles as mothers, spouses, breadwinners, etc., while embracing self-kindness and self-validation. The last subtheme of Psychoeducation emerged as participants emphasized the necessity for greater awareness and understanding of self-compassion and its relevance in daily life. Specifically, they stressed the importance of making this knowledge more accessible for mothers and the need for others to be educated about the challenges mothers face. Example quotes from these subthemes are in Table 3.

Theme 4: Mindfulness
     The fourth theme explored the various methods by which participants incorporated mindfulness activities as part of their practice of self-compassion. The first subtheme, Open Awareness, addressed the specific ways participants engaged in mindfulness activities that allowed them to become more aware of the entire environment. Some participants participated in mindfulness activities that heightened their awareness of their surroundings, although this engagement focused more on relationship mindfulness than self-compassion. The second subtheme of One-Pointed Awareness described participants’ mindfulness practices with focused awareness, concentrating solely on one aspect of the present moment. They fully immersed themselves in the mindfulness practice, recognizing it as a means of personal growth. The last subtheme of Tactile Experiences illustrated participants’ self-soothing or grounding practices involving multiple senses, particularly touch, sensation, smell, and profound observation. These practices typically occurred in the morning and often included enjoying coffee, gardening, or immersing oneself in nature. A sample quote from each subtheme is in Table 4.

Table 3 

Participant Quotes Related to Subthemes of Theme 3: Awareness and Education

Subthemes Participant Quote
Self-Awareness

 

 

Participant 7: “We’d taken a picture of my daughter’s little emotion dolls, or like some animals . . . I’m like, ‛well, that’s perfect.’ Because you know, we all have these emotions. . . . So that really stood out to me, because that’s something that I’ve really learned becoming a parent and a mom . . . we are going to have these emotions. It’s okay to have emotions and that’s something I’ve been, you know, trying to teach my kids to a lot of the time . . . that was a big self-compassion thing that stood out to me was, you know, letting myself feel like, you know, anger or frustration, or all the other ones that were lined up in that picture.”
Acknowledgment From
Self and Others
Participant 3: “I think, that just hearing like, ‛Hey, I see you. I see that you’re working hard, and you’re doing great,’ you know. So I think that that’s what moms need to hear.”
Psychoeducation Participant 8: “Just educating mothers more on like the postpartum journey and normalizing, you know, postpartum depression and postpartum anxiety. . . . I don’t necessarily feel like I was properly educated while I was pregnant, and then postpartum on, you know, how much you, your hormones and everything, it affects you mentally, especially in this world with social media. And you know, everyone’s perfect. And you know, everyone wakes up the next day after, you know, not sleeping with a newborn all night and being exhausted. And you’re supposed to look perfect and act perfect. And you know, I just wish there was more acceptance and kind of education and normalizing the raw journey of postpartum.”

 

Table 4 

Participant Quotes Related to Subthemes of Theme 4: Mindfulness

Subthemes Participant Quote
Open Awareness Participant 8: “I do struggle a lot with my body image as a woman. And just, you know, after you have children and your body changes. So, for me, this photo is also really powerful in that aspect, because I’ve been doing a lot of work with that as well as just not being as hard on myself. And you know, normally, I would be like super uncomfortable at the beach, and especially because it was like a packed day. It was Mother’s Day, wearing a bathing suit, and I just didn’t give a shit, and it was really cool. And I just, I think, because I was just so immersed with my family and being present.”
One-Pointed Awareness Participant 2: “Just paying attention to your body. And if I feel I’m breathing a little shallow, sometimes I notice I’m holding my breath, and sometimes I notice that my shoulders are up here, and that’s usually my little sign to like, okay . . . this doesn’t feel good. Let’s fix this for a minute. Do something.”
Tactile Experiences Participant 4: “We just moved into this house 6 months ago, and I love flowers. And you know, I missed my old house with like my garden, so I had to start over. . . . That’s like my thing. I literally go out there and do that every single morning. I mean, sometimes it’s 3 minutes, sometimes it’s 15 minutes, but mainly it’s 5 minutes. But that’s where I was like, yeah, that’s my time. You know, where I don’t bring the phone out there with me.”

 

Data Presentation to Stakeholders
     Consistent with CBPR goals and photovoice procedures (Wang & Burris, 1997; Wester et al., 2021), we sought to promote change and advocate for mothers by sharing our findings with stakeholders. The stakeholders included the nonprofit community-based agency and private practice that helped recruit participants, and a group of local counselors affiliated with a large community agency who could further increase awareness, co-create meaning, and facilitate change. The study participants were invited to join our meeting with stakeholders who participated in a presentation of the findings, including PowerPoint slides illustrating the primary themes and participant photos. The last question of the SHOWeD method was especially considered: “What can mental health professionals or others do to help foster and support self-compassion in mothers?” We engaged in a collaborative dialogue on implementing the study’s findings into practice, which are further elaborated in the discussion section of this manuscript.

Discussion

Mothers, often serving as the backbone of their families, face silent battles with mental health and identity, heightened by sociocultural ideals and other contextual factors like the recent COVID-19 pandemic’s isolating conditions (Chae, 2014; Davenport et al., 2020; Grose, 2021; Neff, 2011; Prikhidko & Swank, 2018). Mothers’ quiet struggles illuminate an alarming need for more mental health support tailored to the unique experiences of motherhood. Our study explored mothers’ experiences post–COVID-19 pandemic with cultivating self-compassion using photovoice, revealing four overarching themes: (a) Challenges With Self-Compassion, (b) Isolation Versus Common Humanity, (c) Awareness and Education, and (d) Mindfulness.

The first theme suggests that mothers’ challenges with self-compassion are deeply entangled in the daily realities of motherhood and exacerbated by societal ideals. These difficulties extend beyond finding time (which was extremely limited) for self-care; instead, they reflect more profound issues of how mothers perceive and treat themselves amid overwhelming external expectations, often compromising their well-being and prioritizing their children and families (Forbes et al., 2021; Lamar et al., 2019). Feminist theory recognizes how gendered expectations of motherhood create structural time poverty, but the lack of self-compassionate practices calls attention to the systemic issues about women’s unpaid labor and societal expectations. The subtheme of Permission and Justification manifested itself through the notion of self-compassion to “model it” for their children rather than themselves, which aligns with previous research (Lathren et al., 2020). A complex interplay of self-neglect and societal pressures led mothers to conflate the concept of self-care with self-compassion. Consequently, mothers frequently and erroneously equate self-care activities with self-compassion. This misunderstanding underscores the need for psychoeducation on self-compassion in counseling. Although self-care is essential to address one’s immediate needs, self-compassion embodies a more profound, forgiving, and accepting approach to our limitations and failures (Neff, 2011).

The second theme, Isolation Versus Common Humanity, highlights one of the primary components of the self-compassion model (Germer & Neff, 2019; Neff & Germer, 2013) and extends prior research on the impact of social comparison and media on mothers (Chae, 2014; Prikhidko & Swank, 2018). Participants described a dichotomy between the desire to connect with others while grappling with social comparison, thus leading to feelings of inadequacy and isolation. Participants acknowledged the benefits of social media (e.g., accessibility) while simultaneously struggling with the overwhelmingly “positive” and “happy” images in contrast to content addressing the challenges of motherhood. Mothers sought authentic, meaningful connections beyond social media and surface-level interactions. This finding underscores the need for counselors to foster nonjudgmental and compassionate spaces for mothers to connect on their shared experiences and struggles. Additionally, intentional engagement in mindfulness is critical for feelings of isolation that stem from social media usage. This approach can encourage mothers to become more aware of the images they engage with and facilitate the positive benefits of social media. Feminist frameworks emphasize the importance of recognizing personal struggles as connected to broader social patterns, so difficulties connecting with common humanity may also reflect the individualistic messaging mothers receive about “doing it all.”

Awareness and Education, the third theme of our study, was at the forefront of our interviews with participants. Mothers expressed excitement about the construct of self-compassion, leading to critical discussions on the need for more psychoeducation on this practice. Given the abundant research that supports self-compassion as a means of developing mental health and wellness (Ferrari et al., 2019; Fonseca & Canavarro, 2018; Lathren et al., 2020; Mitchell et al., 2018; Moreira et al., 2015), greater access to treatment and resources is crucial to mitigate mothers’ challenges to practicing self-compassion, particularly at the community level. For instance, counselors can use social media platforms to provide psychoeducation on self-compassion, share helpful resources, and foster supportive communities that challenge the “illusion of perfection” (Neff, 2011, p. 70).

The fourth theme underscores how Mindfulness and Self-Compassion are inextricably linked (Neff, 2011; Neff & Germer, 2013). Regardless of how mothers practiced mindfulness (e.g., Open Awareness, One-Pointed Awareness, or Tactile Experiences), it allows them to connect more deeply with their experiences by accepting difficult emotions, becoming more aware of their environment, or engaging the senses. However, it is essential to note that mindfulness and self-compassion do not automatically co-occur. Neff and Dahm (2015) indicated:

It is possible to be mindfully aware of painful thoughts and feelings without actively soothing and comforting oneself or remembering that these feelings are part of the shared human experience. Sometimes it takes an extra intentional effort to be compassionate toward our own suffering, especially when our painful thoughts and emotions involve self-judgments and feelings of inadequacy. (p. 130)

Neff and Dahm’s assertion highlights that while mindfulness fosters awareness, self-compassion requires additional intentionality, particularly in the face of self-judgment. Building on this, counselors play a vital role in educating mothers on the all-encompassing practice of self-compassion, which goes beyond mindful awareness to include self-kindness and a recognition of common humanity. This is especially important in addressing societal and cultural expectations that are contrary to “slowing down,” being kind to oneself, and recognizing one’s connection with others.

Implications for Counselors
     The findings of this study illuminate the need for a multifaceted approach to helping mothers cultivate self-compassion and wellness. Although most participants’ narratives did not explicitly address self-compassion practices and connection to the COVID-19 pandemic, counselors should carefully consider how the additional responsibilities and stressors that emerged during this period may have become normalized and integrated into mothers’ daily lives. The minimal direct pandemic references in participants’ responses may be telling, suggesting that what began as temporary adaptations to crisis have potentially evolved into enduring expectations and workload increases for mothers. This has important implications for how counselors conceptualize and address maternal stress, role strain, and work–life integration in their practice.

Counselors must establish trust, safety, and rapport with mothers to discuss challenging topics such as self-doubt, isolation, and self-worth. Counselors can demonstrate the differences between self-compassion and self-care. For example, although self-care may help to temporarily disconnect after a difficult day (e.g., watching an entertaining television series), self-compassion encourages mothers to become curious about their inner emotional experiences (mindfulness), utilize sources of support (common humanity), and respond to uncomfortable emotions with acceptance and warmth (self-kindness). Counselors may consider various approaches to integrating self-compassion into their work and communities, from offering courses as an MSC-trained teacher (Germer & Neff, 2019) to utilizing The Mindful Self Compassion Workbook: A Proven Way to Accept Yourself, Build Inner Strength, and Thrive (Neff & Germer, 2018) and online resources available through the Center for Mindful Self-Compassion. MSC integrates the practice of mindfulness with the nurturing qualities of self-compassion, creating a potent approach for cultivating emotional resilience. MSC combines mindfulness with nurturing self-compassion to build emotional resilience, improving overall physical wellness while reducing anxiety, depression, and burnout (Germer & Neff, 2019), making it especially valuable for mothers with limited mental health access.

Therapeutic modalities that explore underlying factors contributing to mothers’ reluctance or hesitation to engage in self-compassion practices, such as past experiences, societal expectations, or cultural influences, may increase the effectiveness of programs like MSC. Our participants indicated deeply ingrained negative beliefs about themselves, which can hinder their ability to practice self-compassion. Counselors can help mothers identify and challenge these beliefs, encouraging them to develop more compassionate and realistic self-perceptions through insight-oriented practices, such as Socratic questioning, motivational interviewing, and self-reflective practices.

Though MSC offers therapeutic benefits, it’s not therapy itself. Unlike our study participants who were prepared for vulnerability, counselors must recognize that mothers come with varying needs. Germer and Neff (2019) emphasized that effective MSC delivery depends on a client’s tolerance zone, which includes being in a safe, challenged, or overwhelmed state, with optimal learning occurring in safe or challenged states where clients can progress through acceptance stages while maintaining emotional regulation. Opening oneself to self-compassion may lead to “backdraft,” when individuals encounter previously suppressed painful emotions (Germer & Neff, 2019). Although most mothers can embrace self-compassion practices immediately, some in clinical populations may need deeper therapeutic work as preparation (Neff & Germer, 2018). In addition to the challenges and pressures of motherhood, mothers may arrive with various co-occurring issues such as grief, mental health concerns, complex trauma, or other shame-invoking experiences lying just below the surface (Neff, 2011). It is important that counselors are prepared to utilize evidence-based treatment approaches to help mothers fully access self-compassion practices and handle potential backdrafts.

Theoretical Integration
     Integrating a self-compassion–informed approach into counseling is greatly enhanced by drawing from evidence-based approaches that align with the construct of self-compassion, such as acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), compassion-focused therapy (CFT), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), and Adlerian theory. These therapeutic models support the development of self-compassion, a key aspect of MSC, by promoting emotional resilience, self-awareness, and adaptive coping mechanisms. Gilbert (2014) developed CFT to explicitly target
self-criticism and shame while promoting the cultivation of self-compassion through exercises designed to enhance compassionate self-awareness. CFT provides structured techniques to cultivate a kind and understanding inner voice, benefiting clients with harsh self-judgment. Similarly, Adlerian theory’s holistic social perspective emphasizes social connectedness and community feeling (Adler, 1938), aligning with MSC’s principle of common humanity that recognizes suffering as a shared human experience. By fostering a sense of belonging and encouraging clients to develop self-compassion within the context of their social relationships, Adlerian theory enhances the application of MSC in promoting overall well-being. Moreover, third-wave cognitive-behavioral models are widely praised for integrating validation, mindfulness, and self-acceptance that support self-compassion–informed counseling. ACT’s emphasis on mindfulness and acceptance aligns with self-compassion by encouraging clients to accept their thoughts and feelings without judgment and commit to values-based actions (Hayes et al., 2006). This approach promotes a compassionate stance toward oneself, central to Germer and Neff’s (2019) MSC program. By fostering curiosity and kindness toward internal experiences, ACT helps integrate self-compassion practices into daily life (Hayes et al., 2006). MBCT combines cognitive strategies with mindfulness practices, making it a natural ally to MSC. By teaching clients to recognize and break free from patterns of depressive rumination, MBCT enhances clients’ ability to respond to difficult emotions with mindfulness and self-compassion (Segal et al., 2018). This supports clients in emotional balance and resilience, essential components of MSC (Segal et al., 2018). Lastly, DBT and MSC share core principles. DBT’s mindfulness emphasis and dialectical approach of balancing acceptance with change aligns with MSC, offering robust tools for navigating emotional turbulence through self-acceptance and compassion (Linehan, 2014). 

Multicultural Considerations and Future Implications
     One important consideration is that we recruited participants from local mental health agencies, with the final sample being predominantly White. Participation challenges arose primarily for women of color recruited via social media, including declining participation and dropout because of time constraints. Forbes et al. (2020) noted that the experience of intensive mothering was consistent across various maternal demographics (i.e., race, ethnicity, social class upbringing, relationship status, number of children, and job status). However, Lankes (2022) distinguished that the significance and impact of intensive mothering can vary depending on cultural ideals, resource availability, and structural barriers. This means that mothers from marginalized or underserved communities who face heightened societal stressors and systemic barriers may experience impediments to engaging in self-care practices and accessing mental health resources. Thus, the compounding effects of racism, discrimination, and the unique pressures associated with motherhood can exacerbate mental health challenges and diminish opportunities for cultivating self-compassion and well-being (Condon et al., 2022). Counselors must provide culturally responsive care that acknowledges their clients’ unique, intersectional identities and the historical and current context of oppression and marginalization. Overall, counselors can advocate for policies and systemic changes for underserved mothers, such as by offering self-compassion workshops for mothers in the community, thus increasing access to services.

Community Conversations
     After completing the study, we sought expert validation by presenting our findings to a local community agency through a research presentation and interactive dialogue. We invited clinicians with expertise in self-compassion, family counseling, parenting, women’s issues, and vulnerable populations to share their reactions based on clinical experiences and to offer recommendations. The attending clinicians validated the four overarching themes of our study, sharing stories of motherhood marked by self-criticism, judgment, and expectation. Participants were also invited to this meeting as part of our CBPR methodology. Clinicians who identified as professionals and mothers resonated with the study’s themes, sharing personal narratives that aligned strongly with our findings. They discussed strategies to help their clients, particularly mothers, practice self-compassion, including curating social media feeds (e.g., Instagram) to avoid disempowering content that perpetuates comparison and self-criticism. Additionally, they emphasized the importance of psychoeducation from a systems perspective, suggesting mindfulness and self-compassion as powerful tools for family wellness, and acknowledged the challenges and strengths of mothers. Although no participants opted to attend because of scheduling challenges (finding time was an overarching challenge for participants throughout the study), final thoughts and comments on how this information can impact our work was discussed with community clinicians. Overall, these discussions affirmed the study’s findings and support the need for ongoing research and advocacy initiatives to raise awareness and increase access to self-compassion practices for mothers.

Following expert validation, a nationally recognized treatment center invited us to co-host an experiential seminar open to counselors and community members. The seminar, held in an underserved community, provided an overview of the study’s findings, self-compassion principles, and experiential exercises. We distributed learning materials to participants, and we offered recommendations for integrating self-compassion into daily life, family relationships, and clinical practice. As part of our ongoing efforts to disseminate the findings and advance community advocacy, the research team presented the results at a national conference, which sparked further conscious conversations, reinforcing our commitment to supporting mothers in underserved communities.

Limitations and Future Research
     The present study is not without limitations. Although the nature of photovoice calls for focus groups (Wang & Burris, 1997; Wilson et al., 2007), we decided to meet with participants in smaller groups or individually to accommodate busy schedules. Although the format provided flexibility, the individual interviews can limit dialogue and community building. Additionally, our participants were too busy to attend our community meetings—a crucial component of CBPR. Future research can replicate our study using focus groups, which may provide additional insights into mothers’ self-compassion practices. Researchers may want to consider providing childcare to assist with finding time. Another limitation was a lack of racial and ethnic diversity, as our sample mainly included White women connected to counseling communities. Future research can explore the experiences of mothers with diverse racial, sexual, affectional, and marital backgrounds with self-compassion through photovoice. Mothers with intersecting identities face additional challenges, such as discrimination and systemic inequities, further impacting mental health and parenting stress (Condon et al., 2022). Wellness interventions, like self-compassion skills, could help bridge health disparities for diverse mothers.

Conclusion
     Self-compassion is essential for psychological well-being. Mothers face numerous mental health challenges due to societal expectations and contextual factors, such as post–COVID-19 pandemic shifts in work–life balance, and may encounter obstacles in cultivating self-compassion. The findings reveal the unique challenges and benefits of self-compassion for mothers and the mismatch between the understanding of self-compassion and its practice in daily life. A comprehensive and multidimensional approach is necessary to assist mothers in developing self-compassion and promoting their overall well-being. Counselors must find ways to educate clients and foster this critical skill in mothers, who can often be overlooked, overburdened, and unintentionally undervalued.

Conflict of Interest and Funding Disclosure
The authors reported no conflict of interest
for the development of this manuscript.
Florida Atlantic University provided a small
grant to the researchers for community-engaged
research projects.
 

References

Adler, A. (1938). Social interest: A challenge to mankind. Faber & Faber.

Alon, T., Doepke, M., Olmstead-Rumsey, J., & Tertilt, M. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on gender equality (Working Paper 26947). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26947

Bahn, K., Cohen, J., & van der Meulen Rodgers, Y. (2020). A feminist perspective on COVID-19 and the value of care work globally. Gender, Work, & Organization, 27(5), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12459

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2021). The employment situation—January 2021 (Publication No. USDL-21-0142).
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_02052021.pdf

Burton, A., Hughes, M., & Dempsey, R. C. (2017). Quality of life research: A case for combining photo-elicitation with interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(4), 375–393.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1322650

Carbonneau, N., Goodman, L. C., Roberts, L. T., Bégin, C., Lussier, Y., & Musher-Eizenman, D. R. (2020). A look at the intergenerational associations between self-compassion, body esteem, and emotional eating within dyads of mothers and their adult daughters. Body Image, 33, 106–114.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.007

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). COVID-19 hospitalization and death by race/ethnicity.
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/97937

Chae, J. (2014). “Am I a better mother than you?” Media and 21st-century motherhood in the context of the social comparison theory. Communication Research, 42(4), 503–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214534969

Condon, E. M., Barcelona, V., Ibrahim, B. B., Crusto, C. A., & Taylor, J. Y. (2022). Racial discrimination, mental health, and parenting among African American mothers of preschool-aged children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 61(3), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2021.05.023

Creswell, J. W., & Báez, J. C. (2020). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. SAGE.

Currie, J. L. (2018). Managing motherhood: A new wellness perspective. Springer.

Davenport, M. H., Meyer, S., Meah, V. L., Strynadka, M. C., & Khurana, R. (2020). Moms are not ok: COVID-19 and maternal mental health. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2020.00001

Elliott, S., Powell, R., & Brenton, J. (2015). Being a good mom: Low-income, Black single mothers negotiate intensive mothering. Journal of Family Issues, 36(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13490279

Ferrari, M., Hunt, C., Harrysunker, A., Abbott, M. J., Beath, A. P., & Einstein, D. A. (2019). Self-compassion interventions and psychosocial outcomes: A meta-analysis of RCTs. Mindfulness, 10(8), 1455–1473.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01134-6

Fonseca, A., & Canavarro, M. C. (2018). Exploring the paths between dysfunctional attitudes towards motherhood and postpartum depressive symptoms: The moderating role of self-compassion. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 25(1), e96–e106. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2145

Forbes, L. K., Donovan, C., & Lamar, M. R. (2020). Differences in intensive parenting attitudes and gender norms among U.S. mothers. The Family Journal, 28(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480719893964

Forbes, L. K., Lamar, M. R., & Bornstein, R. S. (2021). Working mothers’ experiences in an intensive mothering culture: A phenomenological qualitative study. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 33(3), 270–294.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2020.1798200

Germer, C. K., & Neff, K. (2019). Teaching the mindful self-compassion program: A guide for professionals. Guilford.

Gilbert, P. (2014). The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(1), 6–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12043

Griffin, A., & May, V. (2012). Narrative analysis and interpretative phenomenological analysis. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (3rd ed., pp. 441–458). SAGE.

Grose, J. (2021, February 4). America’s mothers are in crisis. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/working-moms-coronavirus

Han, A., & Kim, T. H. (2023). Effects of self-compassion interventions on reducing depressive symptoms, anxiety, and stress: A meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 14, 1553–1581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02148-x

Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006

Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.

Hupkau, C., & Petrongolo, B. (2020). Work, care and gender during the COVID-19 crisis. Fiscal Studies, 41(3), 623–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12245

Lamar, M. R., Forbes, L. K., & Capasso, L. A. (2019). Helping working mothers face the challenges of an intensive mothering culture. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 41(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.41.3.02

Lankes, J. (2022). Negotiating “impossible” ideals: Latent classes of intensive mothering in the United States. Gender & Society, 36(5), 677–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432221114873

Larkin, M., & Thompson, A. R. (2011). Interpretative phenomenological analysis in mental health and psychotherapy research. In D. Harper & A. R. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 99–116). Wiley.

Lathren, C., Bluth, K., & Zvara, B. (2020). Parent self-compassion and supportive responses to child difficult emotion: An intergenerational theoretical model rooted in attachment. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(3), 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12388

Linehan, M. M. (2014). DBT® skills training manual. Guilford.

Lofton, O., Petrosky-Nadeau, N., & Seitelman, L. (2021). Parents in a pandemic labor market (Working Paper No. 2021-04). Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. https://doi.org/10.24148/wp2021-04

Mitchell, A. E., Whittingham, K., Steindl, S., & Kirby, J. (2018). Feasibility and acceptability of a brief online self-compassion intervention for mothers of infants. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 21, 553–561.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-018-0829-y

Moreira, H., Gouveia, M. J., Carona, C., Silva, N., & Canavarro, M. C. (2015). Maternal attachment and children’s quality of life: The mediating role of self-compassion and parenting stress. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 2332–2344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0036-z

Myers, J. E., & Sweeney, T. J. (2004). The indivisible self: An evidence-based model of wellness. Journal of Individual Psychology, 60(3), 234–245. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/149232976.pdf

Neff, K. (2011). Self-compassion: The proven power of being kind to yourself. HarperCollins.

Neff, K. D., & Dahm, K. A. (2015). Self-compassion: What it is, what it does, and how it relates to mindfulness. In B. D. Ostafin, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), Handbook of mindfulness and self-regulation (pp. 121–137). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2263-5_10

Neff, K. D., & Germer, C. K. (2013). A pilot study and randomized controlled trial of the mindful self-compassion program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21923

Neff, K., & Germer, C. (2018). The mindful self-compassion workbook: A proven way to accept yourself, build inner strength, and thrive. Guilford.

Orenstein, G. A. & Lewis, L. (2021). Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556096

Park, J. (2021). Who is hardest hit by a pandemic? Racial disparities in COVID-19 hardship in the U.S. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 25(2), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1877566

Prikhidko, A., & Swank, J. M. (2018). Motherhood experiences and expectations: A qualitative exploration of mothers of toddlers. The Family Journal, 26(3), 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480718795116

Psychogiou, L., Legge, K., Parry, E., Mann, J., Nath, S., Ford, T., & Kuyken, W. (2016). Self-compassion and parenting in mothers and fathers with depression. Mindfulness, 7, 896–908.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0528-6

Ruppanner, L., Tan, X., Carson, A., & Ratcliff, S. (2021). Emotional and financial health during COVID-19: The role of housework, employment and childcare in Australia and the United States. Gender, Work, & Organization, 28(5), 1937–1955. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12727

Sackett, C. R., & Jenkins, A. M. (2015). Photovoice: Fulfilling the call for advocacy in the counseling field. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 10(3), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2015.1025173

Segal, Z., Williams, M., & Teasdale, J. (2018). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression (2nd ed). Guilford.

Smith, L., Davis, K., & Bhowmik, M. (2010). Youth participatory action research groups as school counseling interventions. Professional School Counseling, 14(2), 174–182. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42732946

van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Penguin.

Wang, C. C. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health, 8(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.1999.8.185

Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309

Wester, K. L., Wachter Morris, C. A., Trustey, C. E., Cory, J. S., & Grossman, L. M. (2021). Promoting rigorous research using innovative qualitative approaches. Journal of Counseling & Development, 99(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12366

Wilson, N., Dasho, S., Martin, A. C., Wallerstein, N., Wang, C. C., & Minkler, M. (2007). Engaging young adolescents in social action through photovoice: The Youth Empowerment Strategies (YES!) Project. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 27(2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431606294834

World Health Organization. (2021, May). The true death toll of COVID-19: Estimating global excess mortality.
https://www.who.int/data/stories/the-true-death-toll-of-covid-19-estimating-global-excess-mortality

Zamarro, G., Perez-Arce, F., & Jose Prados, M. (2020). Gender differences in the impact of COVID-19. Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California. https://www.ktla.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2020/06/ZamarroGenderDiffImpactCOVID-19_061820-2.pdf

Kelly Emelianchik-Key, PhD, NCC, ACS, LMFT, LMHC-QS, is an associate professor at Florida Atlantic University. Adriana C. Labarta, PhD, NCC, ACS, LMHC, is an assistant professor at Florida Atlantic University. Clara Bossie, MS, ACS, LMFT-QS, is a doctoral candidate at Florida Atlantic University and Owner and Clinical Director of Wisely Wellness LLC. Carman S. Gill, NCC, ACS, LCMHC, is a professor and department chair at Florida Atlantic University. Correspondence may be addressed to Kelly Emelianchik-Key, Department of Counselor Education, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Rd. Bldg. 47, Rm. 275, Boca Raton, FL 33431-0991, Kemelian@fau.edu.

School Counseling Roles Across States: A Content Analysis Using the ASCA National Model

Alexandra Frank, Amanda C. DeDiego, Isabel C. Farrell, Kirby Jones, Amanda C. Tracy 

State policies and school district regulation largely shape the roles and responsibilities of school counselors in the United States. The American School Counselor Association (ASCA) provides guidance on recommendations for school counseling practice; however, state policies may not align with guiding principles. Using a rubric informed by the ASCA National Model, we conducted a problem-driven content analysis to explore state policy alignment with the Define, Manage, Deliver, and Assess components of the model. Our findings indicate state policy differences between K–8 and 9–12 grade levels and within each rubric component. School counselors and school counselor educators can use these findings to support strategic advocacy efforts aimed at increased clarity around school counselors’ roles and responsibilities.

Keywords: content analysis, advocacy, state policy, school counseling, ASCA National Model

     What is a school counselor? The profession has a long history of attempting to answer this question, not always successfully. Role confusion in school counseling was highlighted by Murray (1995) who stated that the roles of school counselors often vary from the printed job description. Murray attributed unclear counseling duties to misunderstandings about school counselors’ roles by stakeholders, such as administrators, parents, and students. Murray also found that differences in legislative definitions of school counseling contributed to role confusion. As an early act of advocacy in school counseling, Murray suggested developing a uniform definition of school counseling, advocating for that definition, and engaging in effective communication strategies among stakeholders as solutions to role confusion. Since this early movement to define school counseling roles, professional groups (e.g., The American School Counselor Association [ASCA]), academic organizations (e.g., School Counselors for MTSS), and professional conferences (e.g., The Evidence-Based School Counseling Conference and ASCA conference) have joined in the efforts to describe school counselor identity and roles. Despite these efforts, school counselors across the United States struggle with the lack of clarity in their roles (Bardhoshi & Duncan, 2009; Chandler et al., 2018).

     School counselors’ impacts on student outcomes are well-documented (O’Connor, 2018). When describing the role and influence of school counselors, researchers point to improved student outcomes, such as decreased student behavior issues (Reback, 2010), increased student achievement (Carrell & Hoekstra, 2014), and increased college-going behavior (Hurwitz & Howell, 2014). School counselors’ roles in supporting student social–emotional health became particularly important when navigating the effects of COVID-19 (McCoy-Speight, 2021). However, Murray’s (1995) concern about legislative differences in defining the role of a school counselor remains. Despite evidence describing positive impacts of school counselors on student outcomes, the school counselor role is often misunderstood and continues to vary from state to state (Carey & Dimmitt, 2012). Recently, state differences were most pronounced in Texas Senate Bill 763 (2023), which proposed to equip chaplains to serve as school counselors, and in Florida’s emphasis on parents as resiliency coaches (Florida Governor’s Press Office, 2023). Additionally, factors such as organizational constraints (Alexander et al., 2022), student–counselor ratios (Kearney et al., 2021), and engagement in non-counseling duties (Blake, 2020; Camelford & Ebrahim, 2017; Chandler et al., 2018) continue to hinder the impact that school counselors can make within their school settings. Intrigued by Murray’s observation regarding the long-standing issues with school counseling roles and duties differing from state to state and recent state initiatives to supplement the role of a school counselor with chaplains or parents (e.g., Texas and Florida), we sought to explore how state-level policies and statutes define school counselor roles and responsibilities and how they align with national recommendations.

Defining School Counseling
     Noting the need for a uniform definition of school counseling, we turned to ASCA. Although ASCA is not the only professional organization supporting school counselors, it has the longest history (formed in 1952) and largest membership (approximately 43,000). Additionally, ASCA exists for the explicit purpose of supporting school counselors by “providing professional development, enhancing school counseling programs, and researching effective school counseling practices” (n.d.-a, About ASCA section). ASCA (2023) defines school counseling as a comprehensive, developmental, and preventative support aimed at improving student outcomes. ASCA (n.d.-b) advocates for a united school counseling vision and voice among stakeholders. Despite their efforts, researchers, educational leaders, and state policymakers continue to hold varied perspectives about the definitions, needs, and roles of school counselors. Although ASCA (2019; 2023) clearly delineates appropriate and inappropriate school counseling roles and responsibilities, school counselors often find themselves asked to engage in activities deemed inappropriate by ASCA (Bardhoshi & Duncan, 2009; Chandler et al., 2018).

     School counselors can use collaboration and advocacy to promote a more appropriate use of their time (McConnell et al., 2020) and to mediate feelings of burnout (Holman et al., 2019). Researchers have discussed the importance of advocacy as integral to pre–school counselor training (Havlik et al., 2019), individual school counseling practice (Perry et al., 2020), and system-wide professional unity (Cigrand et al., 2015). However, such efforts are often limited to a single school or district and often do not include state-level advocacy.

The ASCA National Model
     To support their mission of improving student outcomes, ASCA (2019) recommends a national model as a framework for school counselors. The ASCA National Model is aligned with school counseling priorities, such as data-informed decision-making, systemic interventions, and developmentally appropriate care considerations. Implementation is associated with both student-facing and school counselor–facing benefits. In an introduction to a special issue on comprehensive school counseling programs, Carey and Dimmitt (2012) described findings across six statewide studies highlighting the relationship between program implementation and positive student outcomes, including improved attendance and decreases in rates of student discipline. Pyne (2011) and more recently Fye and colleagues (2022) demonstrated correlations between program implementation and school counselor job satisfaction. Pyne found that school counselors with administrative support and staff collaboration related to program implementation experienced higher rates of job satisfaction. Fye et al. noted that as implementation of the ASCA National Model increased, role ambiguity decreased and job satisfaction increased.

The ASCA National Model consists of four components: Define, Manage, Deliver, and Assess. We outline the model in Table 1 below.

Table 1

Four Components of The ASCA National Model

Define Standards to support school counselors

School counselors are supported in implementation and assessment of a comprehensive school counseling program by existing standards such as the ASCA Mindsets & Behaviors, the ASCA Ethical Standards for School Counselors, and the ASCA School Counselor Professional Standards & Competencies.

Manage Effective and efficient implementation of a comprehensive school counseling program

ASCA outlines planning tools to support a program focus, program planning, and appropriate school counseling activities.

Deliver The actual delivery of a comprehensive school counseling program

School counselors implement developmentally appropriate activities and services to support positive student outcomes. School counselors engage in direct (e.g., instruction, appraisal and advisement, counseling) and indirect (e.g., consultation, collaboration, referrals) student services. ASCA (2019) stipulates that school counselors should spend 80% of their time in direct or indirect student services. School counselors should spend 20% or less of their time on school support activities and/or program planning.

Assess Data-driven accountability measures to assess the efficacy of program delivery

School counselors are charged with evaluating their program’s efficacy and implementing improvements, based on student needs. School counselors should demonstrate that students are positively impacted because of the counseling program.

 

     We extend the Assess component to also include research-based examples on factors contributing to a school counselor’s efficacy. Such factors include student–school counselor ratios. For decades, ASCA has advocated for a student–school counselor ratio of 250:1 as well as broader support for school counselor roles (Kearney et al., 2021). Yet, data from the 2021–2022 school year put the average national student–school counselor ratio at 408:1 (National Center for Education Statistics [NCES], 2023). Researchers demonstrate that schools with ASCA-approved ratios experience increased student attendance, higher test scores, and improved graduation rates (e.g., Carey et al., 2012; Carrell & Carrell, 2006; Goodman-Scott et al., 2018; Lapan et al., 2012).

     Alternatively, Donohue and colleagues (2022) demonstrated that higher ratios relate to worse outcomes for students. Notably, minoritized students and their school communities often face the brunt of increased student–school counselor ratios (Donohue et al., 2022; Education Trust, 2018). Thus, the ASCA alignment is not only concerned with improved student outcomes but also with the equitable provision of mental health services. Given the role ASCA plays in advocating for and structuring the school counselor’s role and responsibilities, we chose to use the components of the ASCA National Model (2019) as a theoretical framework guiding our study. We have incorporated our theoretical framework throughout, including data collection, data analysis, results, discussion, and implications.

Method           

     The purpose of our study was to understand how state policies align with the ASCA National Model. We analyzed state policies defining and guiding the practice of school counseling. In any inquiry, the type and characteristics of the data available should dictate the research methods (Flick, 2015). Content analysis allows researchers to identify recurring themes, patterns, and trends (Krippendorff, 2019). By systematically coding and categorizing content, researchers can uncover insights that might not be immediately apparent through casual observation. Additionally, it enables researchers to analyze large volumes of data in a systematic and replicable manner, reducing the impact of personal bias and increasing the reliability of findings. Because of these factors, we found content analysis to be the best method for our inquiry. We chose a subtype of content analysis—problem-driven content analysis (Krippendorff, 2019). Problem-driven content analysis aims to answer a research question. The research question guiding our analysis was: How are state policies aligned or misaligned with the ASCA National Model?

Sample
     Using the State Policy Database maintained by the National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE; 2023), we pulled current policies from all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia (N = 51) that dictate the role of school counselors and school counseling services. As ASCA (n.d.-c) describes, terms used for school counseling services can vary, and although “school counselor” is favorable to “guidance counselor,” both terms may be found. However, in NASBE’s State Policy Database, the category was specifically listed as “counseling, psychological, and social services,” and the subcategory was listed as “school counseling—elementary” and “school counseling—secondary” (NASBE, 2023). We included policies that govern kindergarten through eighth grade (K–8) and ninth through 12th grade (9–12). Data included all policies related to school counseling delivery and certification, with State Policy Databases sorted into policies governing K–8 (n = 156, 47.42%) and 9–12 (n = 173, 52.58%) levels, for a total of 329 policies.

Design
     From our research question to data reporting, we followed the problem-driven content analysis steps (see Figure 1). We collected language from the policies, including policy type and policy name, and then determined if school counseling was encouraged, recommended, or not specified as either. We built a spreadsheet to divide, define, and identify the state policies into sampling units. We divided them into originating state, policy type, requirements for having school counselors in schools, policy name, and summary of the policy. Additionally, we separated the data into K–8 and 9–12 education designations.

Figure 1

Problem-Driven Content Analysis Process (Krippendorff, 2019)

     The analytical process began with filtering policies for inclusion outlined in our selection criteria. We built a spreadsheet to divide, define, and identify the legislative bills into sampling units. We focused on dividing them into originating state, bill number, year, subcategory, and summary of the bill. After completing the spreadsheet with all the data, Kirby Jones and Amanda C. Tracy tested our coding frame on a sample of text. Although content analysis does not require piloting, Schreier (2012) suggested piloting around 20% of the data to test the reliability of the coding frame. We used 20% of our data (n = 66) to conduct pilot coding.

     We approached the data analysis deductively, with the components of the ASCA National Model (2019) acting as our initial codes. Prior to analysis, we created a coding rubric that we used to analyze each state’s school counseling policy (see Table 2). We used the four components of the ASCA National Model as the rubric criteria: Define, Manage, Deliver, and Assess. Within each criterion, we developed standards ranging from 1 point to 5 points. We chose point ranges based on the information within each criterion. For example, the Define criterion included three standards for 5 total points. We awarded 1 point if a state required (versus recommended) school counselors in school; we awarded 1 point if a state required school counselors to be licensed and/or certified based on a graduate degree; and we awarded 3 points if a state specifically described all three focus areas of school counseling—academic, college/career, and social/emotional.

     Alexandra Frank, Amanda C. DeDiego, and Isabel C. Farrell were involved in creating the rubric and completing initial pilot coding to ensure the usability and utility of the rubric. All team members met throughout the process to ensure workability and fidelity. Following initial testing, each coding pair was trained to appropriately analyze state-level policy data using the rubric. Before finalizing rubric metrics for each state, all team members met again to review metrics and to determine final scores for each state. Importantly, individual state-level rubric scores do not indicate grades, but rather demonstrate evidence of alignment between state-level policy as it is written and the ASCA National Model (2019).

Table 2

Rubric to Evaluate State Policy for Adherence to the ASCA National Model

Aspects of the ASCA National Model

Define

5 points

Manage

1 point

Deliver

1 point

Assess

2 points

Required

1 point

Education

1 point

Focus

3 points

Implementation

1 point

Use of Time

1 point

Accountability

1 point

Ratio

1 point

State has provisions requiring school counselors Requires school counselors to be licensed/certified Areas of focus include:
(1) academic,
(2) college/career,
(3) social/emotional
Role includes appropriate school counseling activities 80% of time spent in direct/indirect services supporting student achievement, attendance, and discipline Evaluation of school counselor role included

Maximum
of 250:1


Research Team
     Our research team consisted of two counselor educators, two counselor education doctoral students, and one master’s-level counseling student. We began meeting as a research team in summer 2023. Conceptualization, data collection, and analysis occurred throughout the fall, ending in December 2023. Frank, DeDiego, and Farrell continued with edits and writing in 2024. Varying counseling backgrounds (including clinical mental health and school counseling), education settings (e.g., urban, rural, research, teaching), and personal identities were represented. All members are united by a passion for mentorship and advocacy. Additionally, DeDiego and Farrell provided expertise in legislative advocacy and content analysis, and Frank and Tracy provided expertise in school counseling. All members are affiliated with counseling programs accredited by the Council for the Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. Frank, DeDiego, and Farrell designed the coding frame and trained Jones and Tracy on the coding process. Frank, DeDiego, and Farrell also resolved any coding conflicts. For example, if a state regulation was unclear, Frank, DeDiego, and Farrell met and decided what code would apply. All members of the research team communicated via email, Google Docs, and/or Zoom meetings to build consensus through the data collection and data analysis processes.

Trustworthiness
     To enhance trustworthiness in this study, we followed the checklist for content analysis developed by Elo et al. (2014), which includes three phases: preparation, organization, and reporting. The preparation phase involves determining the most appropriate data source to address the research question and the appropriate scope of the content and analysis. In this phase, we determined the focus of the project to be policy defining school counselor roles; thus, state-level legislation was the most appropriate data source. Use of the NASBE (2023) database offered a means of limiting scope and focus of the content. Using deductive coding (McKibben et al., 2022), we first developed the rubric coding framework based on the ASCA National Model (2019) and then conducted pilot coding to test the framework.

     During the organization phase, the checklist addresses organizing coding and theming strategies. We first conducted pilot coding to establish how to apply the ASCA National Model (2019) to coding legislation. We evaluated the content using the rubric to determine how the legislation aligned with the ASCA National Model. Elo et al. (2014) suggested researchers also determine how much interpretation will be used to analyze the data. The coding framework using the ASCA National Model offers structure to this interpretation. Data were coded separately for trustworthiness by Jones and Tracy. Then we met to compare coding. If there was discrepancy, one of us reviewed the data in order to reach a two-thirds majority for all of the coding. By the end of the process, all coding met the threshold of two-thirds majority agreement.

     In the Elo et al. (2014) checklist, the reporting phase addresses how to represent and share the results of the analysis. This includes ensuring that categories used to report findings capture the data well and that results are clear and understandable for targeted audiences. The use of a rubric framework offers a clear method to represent and share results of the analysis process.

Results

     Our results highlighted trends in the scope and practice of school counseling across the United States. We organized results by rubric strands (Table 3) and by state, analyzing results for K–8 (Appendix A) and 9–12 (Appendix B). We further describe our results within each strand of the ASCA National Model (2019): Define, Manage, Deliver, and Assess.

Table 3

Summary of Rubric Outcomes by Category

K–8 9–12
Yesa Nob Yesa Nob
Required 37 (72.55%) 14 (27.45%) 40 (78.73%) 11 (21.57%)
Education 40 (78.43%) 11 (21.57%) 50 (98.04%) 1 (1.96%)
Focus

Academic

College/Career

Social/Emotional

 

35 (68.63%)

37 (72.55%)

35 (68.63%)

 

16 (31.37%)

14 (27.45%)

16 (31.37%)

 

40 (78.43%)

41 (80.39%)

40 (78.43%)

 

11 (21.57%)

10 (19.61%)

11 (21.57%)

Implementation 34 (66.67%) 17 (33.33%) 36 (70.59%) 15 (29.41%)
Use of Time 17 (33.33%) 34 (66.76%) 10 (19.61%) 41 (80.39%)
Accountability 21 (41.18%) 30 (58.82%) 29 (56.86%) 22 (43.14%)
Ratio 2 (3.92%) 49 (96.08%) 3 (5.88%) 48 (94.12%)

 aIndicates awarding of a point, as outcome was represented in the policy.
bIndicates no point was awarded, as outcome was not represented in the policy.

     In the state policies, school counselors were designated as required, encouraged, or not specified. For the K–8 level, 72.55% (n = 37) of states required school counselors in schools, 19.61% (n = 10) encouraged the presence of school counselors, and 7.84% (n = 4) of states did not specify a requirement of school counselor presence. At the 9–12 level, 78.73% (n = 40) of states required school counselors in schools, 19.60% (n = 10) encouraged the presence of school counselors, and 1.96% (n = 1) of states did not specify a requirement of school counselor presence.

     The category of not specified included policies that were uncodified or policies that did not address the requirement of school counselors at all. The majority of states required school counselors at the K–8 (n = 37, 72.55%) and 9–12 (n = 40, 78.73%) levels. At the K–8 level, one state had a policy that was uncodified (Michigan) and three did not address the requirements of school counselors (i.e., Hawaii, South Dakota, Wyoming). At the 9–12 level, one state had an uncodified policy (Hawaii) and one did not specify a requirement for school counselors (South Dakota). Forty states (80%) for K–8 and 50 states (98.04%) for 9–12 required school counselors to have a license or certification in school counseling. The only state that did not require certification or licensure was Florida. Thirty-five states (70%) for K–8 and 40 states (78.43%) for 9–12 described the role of a school counselor as supporting students’ academic success. Thirty-seven states (72.54%) for K–8 and 41 states (80.39%) for 9–12 described the role of a school counselor as supporting college and career readiness. Finally, 35 states (68.63%) for K–8 and 40 states (78.43%) for 9–12 described the role of a school counselor as supporting students’ social and emotional growth.

     Within the Manage aspect of the ASCA National Model (2019), we determined if the state outlined appropriate school counseling activities in alignment with ASCA recommendations in policy or statute (e.g., small groups, counseling, classroom guidance, preventative programs). Thirty-four states (66.67%) for K–8 and 36 states (70.59%) for 9–12 outlined school counseling activities in their policy. For Deliver, only 17 states (33.33%) for K–8 and 10 states (20%) for 9–12 outlined whether or not the majority of school counselors’ time should be spent providing direct and indirect student services.

     Moreover, for the Assess category, we evaluated whether the state policy required school counselors to do an evaluation of their role and/or counseling services. Twenty-one states (58.82%) for K–8 and 29 states (56.86%) for 9–12 outlined evaluation requirements. Finally, we evaluated whether the state complied with the ASCA student–school counselor ratio of 250:1. Two states for K–8 (3%; i.e., New Hampshire, Vermont) and three states for 9–12 (5.9%; i.e., Michigan, New Hampshire, Vermont) complied with the recommended ratios. A few states (i.e., Colorado, Illinois, Kentucky, Minnesota, Montana) recommended that state districts follow the ASCA 250:1 recommendation, but it was not a requirement; those state ratios exceeded 250:1.

     Next, we examined overall trends of compliance by grade level and by state. For K–8, eight states (15.69%) had higher scores of ASCA National Model (2019) compliance (i.e., Arkansas, Maine, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Wisconsin) compared to other states in our dataset with a score of 8 out of 9. For 9–12, six states (11.76%) scored 8 out of 9 (i.e., Arkansas, Maine, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Wisconsin). Excluding Hawaii, South Dakota, and Wyoming, because their state policies did not address the requirements of K–8 school counselors, the states with the lowest scores of ASCA National Model compliance, with 1 out of 9 for K–8 were Alabama, Maryland, Missouri, and North Dakota (n = 4, 7.8%). For 9–12 state policy, two states (3.9%)scored 1 out of 9 (i.e., Massachusetts, South Dakota).

Discussion

     Given ASCA’s (n.d.-b) advocacy efforts to develop a unified definition of school counseling, there is a need to assess how those advocacy efforts translate to state policy. Although individual state and district policies shed light on existing discrepancies between school counselor roles and responsibilities, our analysis also provides evidence of alignment with the ASCA National Model (2019) in some areas. These results can inform strategic efforts for further alignment. School counselors can use advocacy to support their role and promote responsibilities more aligned with the ASCA National Model (McConnell et al., 2020). We outline our discussion by again utilizing the four components of the ASCA National Model as a conceptual framework.

Define
     Our findings suggest that the Define component of the ASCA National Model (2019) is well-represented in state and district policies. Although our results highlight differences in policy governing practice in K–8 and 9–12 schools, for the most part, all state and district policies required or encouraged the presence of a school counselor. Additionally, the vast majority of states required that individuals practicing as school counselors hold the appropriate licensure and/or certification. Similarly, most state and district policies defined a school counselor’s role as contributing to students’ academic, college/career, and/or social/emotional development. Vigilance in advocacy efforts remains important, as language in policy can change with each legislative session. For example, Texas Senate Bill No. 763 (2023) introduced legislation allowing chaplains to serve in student support roles instead of school counselors. The Lone Star State School Counselor Association (2023) quickly took action with a published brief condemning the language in the bill. As a result of advocacy efforts, lawmakers changed the verbiage in the bill to hire chaplains in addition to school counselors, rather than in lieu of them.

     Similarly, Florida’s First Lady, Casey DeSantis (Florida Governor’s Press Office, 2023), announced a shift in counseling services to emphasize resiliency and include resiliency coaches—a role in which “moms, dads, and community members will be able to take training covering counseling standards and resiliency education standards” and provide a “first layer of support to students” (para. 8). Although the Florida School Counselor Association emphasizes advocacy efforts, it has not yet published a response to the changes in Florida’s resilience instruction and support plans (Weatherill, 2023). The legislation in Texas and Florida and the response from state-level school counselor associations highlight, once again, the importance of advocacy for creating and maintaining a uniform definition of school counseling.

Manage
     Although ASCA clearly defines appropriate and inappropriate school counseling activities, state policy is less specific on codifying the appropriate use of school counselors’ time and resources. Although most states encouraged appropriate school counseling activities, states did not specifically define appropriate school counseling activities or provide protection around school counselors’ time to implement appropriate school counseling activities. Such findings are consistent with the literature (Bardhoshi & Duncan, 2009; Chandler et al., 2018). Florida’s K–8 policy suggests that school counselors should implement a program that suits the school and department, whereas some states’ K–8 policy, such as New Jersey’s, recommends incorporating the ASCA National Model (2019). Several states include uncodified policy addressing the implementation of a school counseling program. However, as such recommendations are not codified into policy, they do not dictate the day-to-day activities of school counselors. Interestingly, new legislation introducing support roles for chaplains and family/community members only bolsters the need to protect school counselors’ time. Texas Senate Bill No. 763 references the need for support, services, and programming. Florida First Lady Casey DeSantis similarly emphasizes the need for support and mentorship. School counselors are trained professionals equipped to support student outcomes (ASCA, 2019). One wonders whether legislative efforts introducing chaplains and family members would be needed if school counselors’ time was protected in ways to better support students with appropriate school counseling duties. Thus, there remains an opportunity for increased advocacy surrounding the implementation of school counseling programs with specific attention on appropriate versus inappropriate school counseling activities.

Deliver
     ASCA suggests that school counselors should spend 80% of their time in direct/indirect services to support student outcomes. Such efforts are pivotal, as research suggests that school counselors play a key role in supporting student outcomes (e.g., Carey & Dimmitt, 2012; O’Connor, 2018). Researchers indicate that school counselors within a comprehensive school counseling program play an integral role in supporting improved student attendance (Carey & Dimmitt, 2012), graduation rates (Hurwitz & Howell, 2014), and academic performance (Carrell & Hoekstra, 2014). However, few states support student outcomes by codifying a school counselor’s use of time into policy. Idaho’s 9–12 policy instructs school counselors to use most of their time on direct services. While not equivalent to ASCA’s 80%, such efforts represent a start to protecting school counselors’ time and ensuring that school counselors are able to make the impact they are well-trained to in their school settings. Similar to Manage, current legislative efforts only highlight the importance of school counselors spending a majority of their time supporting students through direct services.

Assess
     ASCA continues to focus their advocacy efforts on student–school counselor ratios with good reason; our findings indicate that 2% of K–8 state and district policies and 3% of 9–12 policies specifically outlined a 250:1 ratio that aligns with ASCA recommendations. Yet, researchers demonstrate that reduced student–counselor ratios support improved student outcomes (Carey et al., 2012; Carrell & Carrell, 2006; Goodman-Scott et al., 2018; Lapan et al., 2012). Further, minoritized students and their communities often face the negative consequences of increased student–counselor ratios (Donohue et al., 2022). As such, further advocacy around student–school counselor ratios is also needed from an equity perspective. Some states, such as Colorado, Illinois, Kentucky, and Montana, recommended ASCA ratios, but as is the case with appropriate versus inappropriate school counseling activities, without policy “teeth” to enforce recommendations, school counselors are often continuing to practice in settings that far exceed ASCA ratios, as is consistent with recent findings (NCES, 2023).

     Although many states did not codify policies aligned with the ASCA National Model (2019), several states (North Dakota, New Jersey, Delaware) made reference to the ASCA National Model and recommended alignment. Our analysis supports previous research indicating that advocacy works (Cigrand et al., 2015; Havlik et al., 2019; Holman et al., 2019; McConnell et al., 2020; Perry et al., 2020). Our findings also highlight the value of supporting professional identity through membership in both national organizations and state-level advocacy groups.

Implications
    We explored implications for school counselor educators, school counselors, and school counseling advocates. School counselor educators must prepare future school counselors for their roles as advocates. Counselor educators also play an important role in equipping future school counselors with an understanding of the landscape of the profession (McMahon et al., 2009). As such, including state-level policy and district-level conversations in curriculum helps connect counseling students with the evolving policies guiding their work. The rubric created for this research offers a valuable tool to explore state and school district alignment with the ASCA National Model (2019) and demonstrate areas to focus advocacy efforts. Counseling programs often participate in advocacy efforts, such as Hill Day. School counselor educators can use state-level and district-level policy as a springboard to promote specific advocacy efforts with state and local legislation. On a local level, school counselor educators can use our rubric to frame practice conversations for future school counselors to prepare for future conversations with school principals. Finally, school counselor educators can continue engaging in policy-level research to support ongoing school counseling advocacy. School counselor educators can further illuminate the impacts of school counseling policy by describing perspectives of practicing school counselors. School counselor educators can also engage in quantitative research methods to study the relationships between school counselor satisfaction and state policy adherence to the ASCA National Model (2019).

     School counselors can use our rubric to analyze alignment of school districts when examining job descriptions during their job searches. School counselors could also use the rubric as part of the evaluation component of a comprehensive school counseling program. From our analysis, it appears most imperative that advocacy efforts focus on school counselors’ use of time and student–counselor ratios. Using data, school counselors can continue to advocate for their role to become more closely aligned to ASCA’s recommendations. Kim et al. (2024) described the “urgent need” (p. 233) for school counselors to engage in outcome research. We hope that our framework provides a tool for school counselors to engage in evaluation and advocacy based on our findings. However, school counselors should not be alone in their advocacy efforts. School counseling advocates, including educational stakeholders, counselors, school counselor educators, and educational policymakers, should continue supporting school counselors by advocating on their behalf at the district, state, and national level.

     Future research may focus on the disconnect between state policy and how the districts enact those policies. A content analysis comparing state policy to district rules, regulations, and practices is needed to understand how state policy and district practices align. Finally, although there is frequent legislative advocacy from ASCA, there is a lack of data on state legislators’ knowledge about the ASCA National Model (2019) and ASCA priorities. School counseling researchers can use qualitative methods to interview state legislators, especially after events such as Hill Day, to better detail what legislators understand about the roles and impacts of school counselors.

Limitations
     The purpose of content analysis was to discover patterns in large amounts of data through a systematic coding process (Krippendorff, 2019). We are all professional counselors or counselors-in-training with a passion for advocacy. Thus, as with any qualitative work, there is potential for bias in the coding process. Interrater reliability was used to mitigate this risk. There are many factors that impact the practice of school counseling beyond state-level policy. District policies and school leadership vastly impact the ways that state policy is interpreted and enacted in schools. Thus, this content analysis represents only school counseling regulation as described in policy and may not fully represent the day-to-day experiences of school counselors.

Conclusion

     Although confusion and role ambiguity muddy the school counseling profession, advocacy efforts and outcome research act as cleansers. By providing a rubric to assess alignment between state policy and the ASCA National Model, we hoped to clarify the current state of school counseling practice and provide a helpful tool for future school counselors, current practitioners, educational leaders, and policymakers.

 

Conflict of Interest and Funding Disclosure
The authors reported no conflict of interest
or funding contributions for the development
of this manuscript.

References

Alexander, E. R., Savitz-Romer, M., Nicola, T. P., Rowan-Kenyon, H. T., & Carroll, S. (2022). “We are the heartbeat of the school”: How school counselors supported student mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Professional School Counseling, 26(1b). https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X221105557

American School Counselor Association. (n.d.-a). About ASCA. https://www.schoolcounselor.org/About-ASCA

American School Counselor Association. (n.d.-b). Advocacy and legislation. https://bit.ly/ASCAadvocacylegislation

American School Counselor Association (n.d.-c). Guidance counselor vs. school counselor. https://www.schoolcounselor.org/getmedia/c8d97962-905f-4a33-958b-744a770d71c6/Guidance-Counselor-vs-School-Counselor.pdf

American School Counselor Association. (2019). ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs (4th ed.).

American School Counselor Association. (2023). The role of the school counselor. https://www.schoolcounselor.org/getmedia/ee8b2e1b-d021-4575-982c-c84402cb2cd2/Role-Statement.pdf

Bardhoshi, G., & Duncan, K. (2009). Rural school principals’ perception of the school counselor’s role. The Rural Educator30(3), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v30i3.445

Blake, M. K. (2020). Other duties as assigned: The ambiguous role of the high school counselor. Sociology of Education, 93(4), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040720932563

Camelford, K. G., & Ebrahim, C. H. (2017). Factors that affect implementation of a comprehensive school counseling program in secondary schools. Vistas Online, 1–10.

Carey, J., & Dimmitt, C. (2012). School counseling and student outcomes: Summary of six statewide studies. Professional School Counseling, 16(2), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0001600204

Carey, J., Harrington, K., Martin, I. M., & Hoffman, D. (2012). A statewide evaluation of the outcomes of the implementation of ASCA National Model school counseling programs in rural and suburban Nebraska high schools. Professional School Counseling, 16(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0001600203

Carrell, S. E., & Carrell, S. A. (2006). Do lower student to counselor ratios reduce school disciplinary problems? The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0645.1463

Carrell, S. E., & Hoekstra, M. (2014). Are school counselors an effective education input? Economics Letters, 125(1), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.07.020

Chandler, J. W., Burnham, J. J., Riechel, M. E. K., Dahir, C. A., Stone, C. B., Oliver, D. F., Davis, A. P., & Bledsoe, K. G. (2018). Assessing the counseling and non-counseling roles of school counselors. Journal of School Counseling, 16(7), n7. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1182095.pdf

Cigrand, D. L., Havlik, S. G., Malott, K. M., & Jones, S. G. (2015). School counselors united in professional advocacy: A systems model. Journal of School Counseling, 13(8), n8. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1066331.pdf

Donohue, P., Parzych, J. L., Chiu, M. M., Goldberg, K., & Nguyen, K. (2022). The impacts of school counselor ratios on student outcomes: A multistate study. Professional School Counseling, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X221137283

Education Trust. (2018). Funding gaps: An analysis of school funding equity across the U.S. and within each state.
https://edtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/FundingGapReport_2018_FINAL.pdf

Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633

Flick, U. (2015). Qualitative Inquiry—2.0 at 20? Developments, trends, and challenges for the politics of research. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(7), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415583296

Florida Governor’s Press Office. (2023, March 22). First lady Casey DeSantis announces next steps in Florida’s first-in-the-nation approach to create a culture of resiliency and incentivize parental involvement in schools [Press release]. https://www.flgov.com/eog/news/press/2023/first-lady-casey-desantis-announces-next-steps-floridas-first-nation-approach

Fye, H. J., Schumacker, R. E., Rainey, J. S., & Guillot Miller, L. (2022). ASCA National Model implementation predicting school counselors’ job satisfaction with role stress mediating variables. Journal of Employment Counseling59(3), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/joec.12181

Goodman-Scott, E., Sink, C. A., Cholewa, B. E., & Burgess, M. (2018). An ecological view of school counselor ratios and student academic outcomes: A national investigation. Journal of Counseling & Development, 96(4), 388–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12221

Havlik, S. A., Malott, K., Yee, T., DeRosato, M., & Crawford, E. (2019). School counselor training in professional advocacy: The role of the counselor educator. Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy, 6(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326716X.2018.1564710

Holman, L. F., Nelson, J., & Watts, R. (2019). Organizational variables contributing to school counselor burnout: An opportunity for leadership, advocacy, collaboration, and systemic change. The Professional Counselor, 9(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.15241/lfh.9.2.126

Hurwitz, M., & Howell, J. (2014). Estimating causal impacts of school counselors with regression discontinuity designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00159.x

Kearney, C., Akos, P., Domina, T., & Young, Z. (2021). Student-to-school counselor ratios: A meta-analytic review of the evidence. Journal of Counseling & Development, 99(4), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12394

Kim, H., Molina, C. E., Watkinson, J. S., Leigh-Osroosh, K. T., & Li, D. (2024). Theory-informed school counseling: Increasing efficacy through prevention-focused practice and outcome research. Journal of Counseling & Development102(2), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12507

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781

Lapan, R. T., Gysbers, N. C., Stanley, B., & Pierce, M. E. (2012). Missouri professional school counselors: Ratios matter, especially in high-poverty schools. Professional School Counseling, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0001600207

Lone Star State School Counselor Association. (2023). SB 763 and Texas school counselors. https://www.lonestarstateschoolcounselor.org/news_issues

McConnell, K. R., Geesa, R. L., Mayes, R. D., & Elam, N. P. (2020). Improving school counselor efficacy through principal-counselor collaboration: A comprehensive literature review. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 32(2). https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1063&context=mwer

McCoy-Speight, A. (2021). The school counselor’s role in a post-COVID-19 era. In I. Fayed & J. Cummings (Eds.), Teaching in the post COVID-19 era (pp. 697–706). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74088-7_68

McKibben, W. B., Cade, R., Purgason, L. L., & Wahesh, E. (2022). How to conduct a deductive content analysis in counseling research. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 13(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2020.1846992

McMahon, H. G., Mason, E. C. M., & Paisley, P. O. (2009). School counselor educators as educational leaders promoting systemic change. Professional School Counseling, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0901300207

Murray, B. A. (1995). Validating the role of the school counselor. The School Counselor43(1), 5–9. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23901422

National Association of State Boards of Education. (2023). State policy database. https://statepolicies.nasbe.org

National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). National teacher and principal survey. Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ntps

O’Connor, P. J. (2018). How school counselors make a world of difference. Phi Delta Kappan99(7), 35–39.
https://kappanonline.org/oconnor-school-counselors-make-world-difference

Perry, J., Parikh, S., Vazquez, M., Saunders, R., Bolin, S., & Dameron, M. L. (2020). School counselor self-efficacy in advocating for self: How prepared are we? Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 13(4), 5. https://research.library.kutztown.edu/jcps/vol13/iss4/5

Pyne, J. R. (2011). Comprehensive school counseling programs, job satisfaction, and the ASCA National Model. Professional School Counseling, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X1101500202

Reback, R. (2010). Schools’ mental health services and young children’s emotions, behavior, and learning. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(4), 698–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20528

S.B. 763, 88th Cong. (2023). https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=88R&Bill=SB763

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529682571

Weatherill, A. (2023). Florida Department of Education update. Florida Department of Education. https://www.myflfamilies.com/sites/default/files/2023-11/DOE%20Update-DCF%20committee%20meeting%206-28-23.pdf

 

Appendix A

Breakdown of State Rubric Scores for ASCA Alignment for K–8 Schools

Define

(5 points)

Manage

(1 point)

Deliver

(1 point)

Assess

(2 points)

State Score

(9 points)

Required

(1 point)

Education

(1 point)

Focus

(3 points)

Implementation

(1 point)

Use of Time

(1 point)

Accountability

(1 point)

Ratio

(1 point)

Total
AL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
AK 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 5
AZ 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 6
AR 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 8
CA 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
CO 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 6
CT 0 1 3 1 1 1 0 7
DE 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 4
DC 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
FL 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
GA 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 6
HI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ID 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 7
IL 0 1 3 1 1 1 0 7
IN 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 6
IA 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 5
KA 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
KY 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4
LA 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 7
ME 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 8
MD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
MA 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 4
MI 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2
MN 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 4
MI 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 7
MO 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
MT 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 7
NE 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 3
NV 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 8
NH 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 8
NJ 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 4
NM 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
NY 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
NC 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 7
ND 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
OH 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 3
OK 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
OR 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 8
PA 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 8
RI 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 5
SC 1 1 3 0 1 0 0 6
SD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TN 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 6
TX 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 6
UT 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
VT 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 6
VA 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 7
WA 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 6
WV 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 8
WI 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 8
WY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 37 40 107 34 17 21 2

Note. Categories refer to the ASCA National Model (2019).

Appendix B

Breakdown of State Rubric Scores for ASCA Alignment for 9–12 Schools

Define

(5 points)

Manage

(1 point)

Deliver

(1 point)

Assess

(2 points)

State Score

(9 points)

Required

(1 point)

Education

(1 point)

Focus

(3 points)

Implementation

(1 point)

Use of Time

(1 point)

Accountability

(1 point)

Ratio

(1 point)

Total
AL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
AK 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 5
AZ 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 6
AR 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 8
CA 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 6
CO 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 6
CT 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
DE 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
DC 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
FL 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 4
GA 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
HI 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 4
ID 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 7
IL 0 1 3 1 1 1 0 7
IN 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 6
IA 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
KA 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
KY 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 4
LA 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 6
ME 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 8
MD 1 1 3 0 0 1 0 6
MA 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
MI 0 1 3 1 0 1 1 7
MN 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 6
MI 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 7
MO 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
MT 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 6
NE 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 6
NV 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
NH 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 8
NJ 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 5
NM 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
NY 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
NC 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 4
ND 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
OH 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2
OK 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
OR 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 6
PA 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 8
RI 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 5
SC 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
SD 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
TN 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
TX 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 7
UT 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
VT 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 6
VA 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 7
WA 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 7
WV 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 8
WI 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 8
WY 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 4
Total 40 50 121 36 10 29 3

Note. Categories refer to the ASCA National Model (2019).

 

Alexandra Frank, PhD, NCC, is an assistant professor at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. Amanda C. DeDiego, PhD, NCC, ACS, BC-TMH, LPC, is an associate professor at the University of Wyoming. Isabel C. Farrell, PhD, NCC, LPC, is an associate professor at Wake Forest University. Kirby Jones, MA, LCMHCA, is a licensed counselor at Camel City Counseling. Amanda C. Tracy, MS, NCC, PPC, is a doctoral candidate at the University of Wyoming. Correspondence may be addressed to Alexandra Frank, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, School of Professional Studies, 651 McCallie Ave, Room 105D, Chattanooga, TN 37403, Alexandra-Frank@utc.edu

Lifetime Achievement in Counseling Series: An Interview with Barbara Herlihy

Wendi L. Ferrell, Joshua D. Smith, Neal D. Gray

Each year TPC presents an interview with an influential veteran in counseling as part of its Lifetime Achievement in Counseling series. This year, Dr. Barbara Herlihy shared insights from her decades-long commitment to the professionalization of counseling and the evolution of the profession’s ethical standards. Dr. Herlihy’s scholarship and service have had a profound effect on how counseling ethics are taught, applied, and revised to remain relevant in an ever-evolving world. In this interview, she connects counselors’ professional ethical obligations to the advancement of social justice and the internationalization of the profession. We are grateful for Dr. Herlihy’s contributions to our profession and for the wisdom that she shared in this interview.
—J. Richelle Joe, Editor

     Barbara Herlihy, PhD, NCC, is Professor Emerita in the counselor education program in the College of Education and Human Development at the University of New Orleans. She is a Fellow of the American Counseling Association and is a recipient of the Chi Sigma Iota Thomas J. Sweeney Professional Leadership Award, the SACES Courtland Lee Social Justice Award, and the ACES Distinguished Mentor Award.

A prolific writer, she is co-author (with Dr. Gerald Corey) of the ACA Ethical Standards Casebook and (with Dr. Theodore Remley) of Ethical, Legal, and Professional Issues in Counseling, and co-editor (with Dr. Cassie Storlie) of Counseling Leaders & Advocates. She has authored or co-authored over 100 journal articles and book chapters, primarily on ethics, social justice, and feminist therapy. She serves as Associate Editor for Ethics for Counseling and Values. She has served twice as Chair of the ACA Ethics Committee, and she currently serves as Chair of the ACA Ethics Appeals Committee. In recent years, she has become passionate about furthering the globalization of the counseling profession and has presented seminars and workshops across the United States and in other countries. She currently serves as Co-Director of Global Issues for the International Institute for the Advancement of Counseling Theory.

1. Can you provide more details about your experience as Chair of the ACA Ethics Appeal Committee? What were your key responsibilities, and how did the committee operate in addressing ethical issues in the counseling profession? What drew you to the field of counseling ethics, and what makes this area so meaningful to you, both personally and professionally?

Looking back, I realize I’ve been engaged consistently with the ACA Code of Ethics in some way for several decades now. I’ve served on the ACA Ethics Committee, the ACA Ethics Appeal Committee, and on Ethics Code Revision task forces; co-authored (first with Larry Golden and then with Gerald Corey) the most recent four editions of the ACA Ethical Standards Casebook; and presented on various ethical issues at numerous professional conferences. With this constant engagement, one might think that I can recite the Code of Ethics from memory. No, not even close! However, I do have a feel for how the Code has evolved over the decades to continue to meet the needs of counselors in a constantly changing and increasingly complex world of practice.

That constant evolution is a major reason why ethics has remained interesting and meaningful to me over the years. Opportunities are constantly being created to ponder new and intriguing ethical dilemmas. I’m routinely challenged to refine how I teach ethics to help students develop finely honed ethical reasoning skills, to research and write about ethical issues as they emerge, and to serve the counseling profession through membership on committees and task forces.

Of all the committees on which I have served, I would say that the ACA Ethics Committee and the Ethics Appeal Committee are the most challenging. Ethics and Ethics Appeals Committee members are charged with reviewing all the evidence provided in a complaint or an appeal and then rendering a judgment. If a counselor is found to be in violation of one or more ethical standards, then the appropriate consequence (which can be anything from a recommendation to change a particular practice to permanent expulsion from ACA) must be chosen and applied. Because counselors are trained to be nonjudgmental and because we gravitate toward forgiveness and compassion rather than imposing punishments, the entire process can be very uncomfortable. In my experience, the ACA members who take on these committee assignments take them very seriously and are keenly aware that their decisions can be consequential. Thankfully, these committees typically have only a very small number of complaints to adjudicate over the course of a year. Formal complaints of ethical violations against counselors are rare, considering the thousands of ACA members who are in practice at any given time, and appeals are even more uncommon. This speaks to the integrity of the practitioners of our profession!

2. Given the current climate, ethical concerns are becoming even more pressing. What are your thoughts on the tension between personal and professional values, and how counselors can uphold ethical standards while respecting cultural diversity and individual client autonomy?

Conflicts between personal and professional values is an issue that jumped into bold relief about 15 years ago as a result of two court cases, Ward v. Wilbanks (2010, 2012) and Keeton v. Augusta State University (2011), in which students were dismissed from their master’s programs in counseling after they refused to counsel clients regarding the clients’ same-sex affectional relationships. The students argued that these relationships were not acceptable according to their religious beliefs. These cases spawned considerable discussion about values conflicts in counseling. Counselor educators grappled with how to best teach students to set aside, or “bracket,” their personal values when entering a counseling session. A body of professional literature developed around managing conflicts between personal and professional values and around the ethical decision-making process when values conflicts exist.

The difficulties associated with counseling clients whose values differ from those of the counselor re-emerged during the run-up to the 2024 presidential election, a time when it seemed that most Americans had such strong political feelings that they found it difficult if not impossible to really hear each other’s viewpoints. Again, counselors struggled when clients expressed views with which the counselors strongly disagreed. Although the specific values-laden issues were different from those that emerged around the students who were dismissed from their training programs, counselors sometimes struggled to set aside their personal values so they could be fully present for their clients. To me, it seems inevitable that in our diverse culture, these issues will continue to emerge. Our work as counselors will be challenged by values conflicts, and I believe we will need to remain vigilant to our own experiences, and work to identify both our explicit and implicit biases so that we can continue to honor and respect our clients without judging their personal value systems. We are a richly diverse society, and as I’ve been saying for many years, multicultural competence and ethical practice go hand in hand—neither one can exist without the other.

3. Given your extensive knowledge and experience in counseling, how do you maintain your motivation and enthusiasm for your work, especially during difficult periods? What aspects of counseling resonate most with you, and are there any particular initiatives or methods that you’re currently excited about?

I have been blessed with the incredibly good fortune of working in what is, for me, the perfect profession. Knowing that as a counselor I may have touched some lives in meaningful ways, and that as a counselor educator I’ve had the privilege of mentoring young professionals who went on to make significant contributions, has been more than enough to maintain my motivation and enthusiasm. Seeking out my own counselor whenever I hit a rough spot on my own personal journey has also sustained me.

Ethics, multicultural competence, social justice, and feminist therapy have been consistent themes throughout my work. At this point in my journey, I am also passionate about the internationalization of counseling. I hope to help find ways to extend helping and healing, whether or not the process is formally called “counseling,” to serve marginalized communities across the globe. I’m also intrigued by the broad spectrum of counseling theory, and how we can connect it more directly to effective practice, particularly with culturally diverse client populations in the United States and internationally.

4. Would you take a moment and share your thoughts on the internationalization of counseling—specifically, how counseling practices are expanding across borders and adapting to different cultural contexts? What are the challenges and benefits of these cross-cultural exchanges, and how does the profession develop effective practice across diverse populations?

One of the exciting projects in which I am currently involved is a “world mapping” initiative, sponsored by the International Institute for the Advancement of Counseling Theory and spearheaded by Dr. Ed Neukrug of Old Dominion University. Along with Dr. Courtland C. Lee, I co-chair the Global Subgroup that is engaged in the mapping project. This year we are exploring South America; our incredible graduate assistant, Kacey Bunting, is presently conducting interviews with leaders who engage in and teach counseling/helping/healing in South American countries. (We refer broadly to “counseling/helping/healing” as many countries don’t have formal counseling professions.) As we analyze Kacey’s interviews, we hope to learn about approaches that are unique to these countries and the extent to which and how Euro-American theories and practices are being adapted. We’re eager to see what we can learn about mental health and the helping process in other countries. Of course, many challenges exist, including language barriers and lack of contact information that would enable us to identify and connect with key people. However, the anticipated benefits far outweigh the challenges. In addition to helping counselors and counseling students improve their “global citizenship,” an attribute that Dr. Lee has emphasized in his writings, this project should provide us with a wealth of information that can be used to improve our counseling practices here in the United States, particularly with culturally diverse clients.

5. How have you seen the counseling profession evolve over the years? What changes, either positive or negative, have you observed?

Over my several decades as a counselor and counselor educator, I have witnessed incredible changes in our profession. I think these changes are reflected in the ways that the ACA Code of Ethics has evolved since it was first published in 1961. The original contained no section on technology, of course, but it also made no mention of diversity or multicultural competence. Early versions made what seem now to be rather simplistic statements like “dual relationships should be avoided.” Over the years, the code has been revised periodically to reflect a constantly changing and increasingly complex world of practice.

Overall, I think the most significant change in a positive direction has been the increased professionalization of counseling. Hard-won battles have resulted in the achievement of counselor licensure in all 50 states, the establishment of training standards, and the inclusion of counselors in diverse work settings like the military, inpatient and outpatient mental health facilities, and business and industry.

6. Looking ahead, what do you envision for the future of counseling, and what do you see as potential challenges or boundaries that might delay progress or limit growth in the profession? How do your relationships with counseling associations and organizations influence or shape the evolution of your practice, and do you see any potential challenges or support coming from these affiliations?

The counseling profession in the United States is, inevitably, a microcosm of our society. I am concerned that relationships among our professional associations seem to be divisive in some ways, and that right now our profession does not seem to speak with one voice to our public. My hope is that we will be able to focus on our common purpose and use our united voice to help ensure that social justice issues have a prominent position in our politics, our lives, and our work. Professional associations such as ACA and NBCC have been instrumental in my own professional development, and they continue to be a source of support. I am honored to have had opportunities to give back, in small measure, what I have received, through service to professional associations. If I may end with a word to early-career counselors and counselor educators—those service opportunities exist for you, as well. I hope you will get involved!

This concludes the 10th interview for the annual Lifetime Achievement in Counseling Series. TPC is grateful to Wendi L. Ferrell, Joshua D. Smith, and Neal D. Gray for providing this interview. Wendi L. Ferrell is a graduate candidate at the University of Mount Olive. Joshua D. Smith, PhD, NCC, LCMHC, is an assistant professor at the University of Mount Olive. Neal D. Gray, PhD, LCMHC-S, is a professor at Lenoir-Rhyne University. Correspondence can be emailed to Joshua Smith at jsmith@umo.edu.

Bridging the Gap: Advancing Equity in Mental Health Counseling
Introduction to the Special Issue

Michael Jones, Stacey Diane Arañez Litam, Latoya Haynes-Thoby

This special issue of The Professional Counselor (TPC) honors the NBCC Foundation’s 2024 Bridging the Gap Symposium: Eliminating Mental Health Disparities. The theme for the symposium emphasized the need for a shift from simply acknowledging disparities to actively working toward equitable mental health care for historically underserved populations. The symposium provided a space for counselors, educators, and advocates to engage in discussions on how to dismantle systemic barriers that disproportionately affect Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC); lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and other sexual identities (LGBTQIA+) individuals; and other marginalized groups. The selected articles in this issue reflect this ongoing effort by offering research, critical perspectives, and strategies for fostering more inclusive counseling practices.

The articles in this issue address the complexities of eliminating mental health disparities by examining issues related to mental health care access, strengthening cultural competence, and the importance of integrating social justice frameworks into counseling practice. Each article brings a unique perspective, yet they collectively emphasize the need for action to challenge outdated models and create meaningful change. The contributions in this issue reinforce the responsibility of mental health professionals to engage in advocacy, ensure culturally responsive care, and elevate the voices of those who have historically been excluded from mainstream mental health discourse.

The first article, “The Power of Decolonizing Research Practices,” by Pham, Perry-Wilson, Holmes, Schroeder, Reyes, and Pollok, focuses on the role of decolonized research methodologies in advancing mental health equity. Traditional research practices have historically marginalized non-White communities by reinforcing Eurocentric perspectives and deficit-based narratives. This article highlights the use of photovoice methodology to amplify the experiences of queer womxn of color (QWoC), shifting the focus from pathology to resilience and community-driven healing. The authors argue that by engaging in decolonized research approaches, scholars and practitioners can challenge oppressive structures within academia and mental health care. The article serves as a call to action for counselors and researchers to adopt ethical, culturally affirming scholarship that prioritizes community engagement and self-determination.

“Applying the Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competencies to Eating Disorder Treatment,” by Labarta, Demezier, and Vazquez, challenges the widely held misconception that eating disorders primarily affect White, affluent individuals. This stereotype has contributed to treatment models that often overlook the diverse racial, socioeconomic, and gender identities of those experiencing eating disorders. The authors apply the Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competencies (MSJCC) to demonstrate how counselors can challenge biases and implement culturally affirming interventions to address disparities in eating disorder diagnosis and treatment. Through case vignettes, the article illustrates practical applications for creating more inclusive approaches to care and highlights the responsibility of counselors, educators, and supervisors to actively engage in advocacy efforts that promote equitable treatment for all individuals affected by eating disorders.

In the third article, “Operationalizing Microaffirmations for Queer and Transgender People of Color,” Paul, Isadore, Ravi, Lewis, Qisti, Hietpas, Hermanson, and Su examine the role of microaffirmations in reducing the mental health disparities experienced by queer and transgender people of color (QTPOC). Discrimination and systemic oppression continue to impact QTPOC individuals at higher rates, contributing to increased mental health concerns such as depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. This article explores how microaffirmations—small but meaningful acts of validation and support—can serve as protective factors, fostering a greater sense of belonging and emotional well-being. The study offers practical guidance for integrating affirming practices into counseling settings at both the individual and systemic levels. By emphasizing the importance of intentional, identity-affirming interactions, this article underscores how counselors can create safer and more inclusive spaces for QTPOC clients.

“‘You Good, Bruh?’: An Exploration of Socially Constructed Barriers to Counseling for Millennial Black Men,” by Cofield, highlights the ongoing challenges Black men face when seeking mental health support. Although there has been a growing awareness of the mental health issues faced within the Black community, millennial Black men remain one of the most underserved groups in counseling. Using critical race theory (CRT), Black critical theory (BlackCrit), and Black masculinity theory, this study identifies three major barriers to counseling engagement: Black masculine fragility, racial distrust, and invisibility. The findings reveal how cultural norms surrounding masculinity, experiences of racial trauma, and systemic biases within mental health services deter Black men from seeking counseling. The article calls for a shift in the field of mental health to better engage and retain Black male clients by implementing culturally responsive strategies, promoting representation, and addressing the deep-rooted historical and societal factors that contribute to counseling avoidance.

The final article, “Shifting Paradigms: Exploring Multicultural Approaches to Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy in Counseling,” by Prioleau and Panjwani, examines the emergence of psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) through a multicultural and social justice lens. Although PAT has gained recognition as a promising intervention for various mental health concerns, BIPOC communities remain largely underrepresented in research and clinical practice. The article critiques the Eurocentric framing of psychedelics in Western medicine and highlights the longstanding history of plant medicine within Indigenous healing traditions. By acknowledging the systemic barriers that prevent equitable access to PAT, the authors explore ways to integrate cultural competence, ethical frameworks, and advocacy into psychedelic therapy training and implementation. The article also discusses issues such as cultural appropriation, disparities in research participation, and the need for more inclusive clinical approaches that respect traditional healing practices.

Together, these articles reflect a collective effort to eliminate mental health disparities by addressing critical issues related to access, representation, and culturally responsive care. Each contribution challenges traditional paradigms and offers actionable steps for creating more inclusive and equitable mental health services. The theme of eliminating mental health disparities is not just an abstract ideal; it is a necessary call to action that requires sustained commitment from the counseling profession.

As counselors, counselor educators, and researchers, we must move beyond awareness and take intentional steps toward dismantling systemic barriers that prevent marginalized communities from receiving the mental health support they need. This means integrating social justice frameworks into clinical practice, expanding research methodologies to center diverse perspectives, and advocating for policies that promote accessibility and inclusivity in mental health care. It also requires a willingness to engage in critical self-reflection, challenge biases, and amplify the voices of those who have been historically excluded from conversations about mental health.

As you engage with this special issue, we encourage you to consider how these perspectives can inform your work. How can you integrate the insights from these articles into your own practice, teaching, or advocacy efforts? What steps can you take to ensure that your work actively contributes to the elimination of mental health disparities rather than simply acknowledging their existence? Our hope is that this collection of articles serves as both an educational resource and an inspiration for continued action toward equity in mental health counseling.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Michael Jones (he/him), PhD, NCC, BC-TMH, LPC-S, is a counselor educator, clinician, and author specializing in clinical supervision and multicultural counseling. Dr. Jones is committed to training ethical and culturally competent counselors and integrating innovative instructional methods, including AI, into graduate education. His research and professional interests include telehealth, Black male mental health, and assessing the effectiveness of clinical supervisors. Dr. Jones has trained over 9,000 clinicians in telemental health, published extensively, and presented at national and international conferences. He is a co-editor of the upcoming book Mental Health and the Black Man: A Mixtape Experience of Hardship and Harmony and is actively involved in professional service, including serving on ethics committees and advisory councils. Dr. Jones was a 2013 NBCC Doctoral Minority Fellowship Program recipient and a member of the Dream Team cohort.

Stacey Diane Arañez Litam (she/her/siya), PhD, NCC, CCMHC, LPCC-S, is an associate professor of counselor education at Cleveland State University, racial equity strategist, and licensed professional clinical counselor and supervisor, as well as a diplomate and clinical sexologist with the American Board of Sexology. Dr. Litam is a member of the Forbes Health Advisory Board, the Advisory Council Chair for the National Board for Certified Counselors (NBCC) Minority Fellowship Program, and a 2023 recipient of Crain’s Cleveland 40 Under 40. Dr. Litam’s work has been featured in the White House, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Forbes Health, National Public Radio (NPR), Discovery Magazine, Dutch BBC, Psychology Today, National Institutes of Health, Mental Health Academy, The Daily Mail, and The Filipino Channel, as well as in podcasts, documentaries, and news outlets. She has contributed to over 50 academic publications, and her book, Patterns That Remain: A Guide to Healing for Asian Children of Immigrants, combines research, storytelling, and history to provide a practical framework to heal diasporic wounds, break intergenerational trauma patterns, and strengthen relationships.

Latoya Haynes-Thoby (she/her), PhD, NCC, ACS, LPC, is an assistant professor in the Neag School of Education at the University of Connecticut. Her work explores the benefits of culturally responsive and trauma-informed care that promotes resilience and thriving, especially for marginalized children, adults, families, and communities. Using a critical lens, her research focuses on issues such as individual and community healing from trauma, trauma resilience, and trauma-informed counseling and supervision. Dr. Haynes-Thoby is passionate about counselor training and the operationalization of practices that promote thriving after trauma. She recently co-edited a counselor training textbook, Foundations in Becoming a Professional Counselor: Advocacy, Social Justice, and Intersectionality. Dr. Haynes-Thoby is both a 2015 Master’s Minority Fellow and a 2018 Doctoral Minority Fellow with the NBCC Foundation’s Minority Fellowship Program.

The Power of Decolonizing Research Practices

Jessi Pham, Tiffany Perry-Wilson, Kevlyn Holmes, Grace Schroeder, Ana Reyes, Michelle Pollok

Decolonial research helps us move away from extractive research methodologies that maintain the wounded subject position and legitimize oppressive practices. Additionally, decolonial research challenges dominant Eurocentric paradigms that have historically shaped the counseling profession. Thus, we offer this article to demonstrate an approach to decolonizing research practices. This article discusses (a) the limits of traditional research approaches, (b) a demonstration of decolonized research methods in action, and (c) considerations for counselor educators and researchers. In alignment with our goal of shifting the research paradigm away from dominant and often oppressive practices, we use a collective and relatable voice that speaks to both our personal identities and our unity as a team working toward the decolonialization of academic research.

Keywords: decolonizing research, research paradigm, oppressive practices, wounded subject position, counselor educators

     Research, particularly within the counseling profession, has historically perpetuated oppressive structures, contributing to the pathologization and marginalization of non-White communities (American Psychological Association [APA], 2021; Singh et al., 2021). Traditional research methodologies often reinforce these power imbalances, reducing marginalized individuals to their experiences of trauma and oppression. In response, there is a growing movement toward decolonial and liberatory research practices that aim to center the voices and experiences of marginalized communities, fostering empowerment and healing (Goodman et al., 2015; Neville et al., 2024; Shin, 2016).

As an example of this, we presented and discussed a photovoice exhibit at the 2024 National Board for Certified Counselors Foundation (NBCCF) Bridging the Gap Symposium, which sought to share the healing experiences of nine queer womxn of color (QWoC). Grounded in intersectionality theory and photovoice methodology, our presentation aimed to highlight the strengths and resilience of QWoC, moving away from deficit-based narratives. This article will discuss the background of our decolonial research approach, the overview and positionality statements of our presentation, the reflections of presenters and attendees, and important considerations for counselor educators and researchers committed to decolonizing their practices.

History of Harm Caused by Research
     Mental health research has, directly and indirectly, contributed to hegemonic science, harming marginalized communities by pathologizing anything that has strayed from White, Eurocentric standards (APA, 2021; Singh et al., 2021). Examples of this pathologizing range from the inclusion of homosexuality as a mental disorder in the first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders to the fictitious diagnosis of drapteomania, a type of “mania” that drove enslaved persons to run from their oppressors (Auguste et al., 2023; Ginicola et al., 2017). Mental health professionals used psychological research to support the segregation of Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) and the “civilizing programs” that attempted to eradicate Indigenous people’s culture (APA, 2021; Auguste et al., 2023). The mental health field continues to use psychological assessments formulated by and for White cisgender heterosexual men, which in turn contributes to the pathologization and oppression of BIPOC communities and other marginalized groups (Auguste et al., 2023; Lee & Boykins, 2022). All research operates within oppressive structures, some of which include the influences of  White supremacy and heterosexism, which impact how we design, conceptualize, analyze, and disseminate research that often informs our clinical and teaching practices (Goodman et al., 2015).

Moving Away From the Wounded Subject Position
     Similarly, most of the existing literature on LGBTQ BIPOC solely focuses on the pain and trauma of discrimination and oppression—inadvertently keeping research attendees in the wounded subject position (Brown, 1995). The wounded subject position reduces LGBTQ BIPOC to their experiences of discrimination and oppression. Furthermore, the wounded subject position promotes oppression by reinforcing existing power relations (Hudson & Romanelli, 2020) and deficit-based narratives. Consequently, our work moves away from deficit-based research questions and methodologies that reinforce oppressive and extractive research practices. Our work infuses the work of various Indigenous, anti-racist, anti-oppressive, liberatory, and decolonial scholars (e.g., Audrey Lorde, Dr. Jennifer Mullan, Paulo Freire, Dr. Zuri Tau) to intentionally move away from extractive research methodologies.

Decolonizing Research
     Colonization is foundational to many existing research practices that extract from marginalized communities to systemically stratify the value of knowledge based on dominant narratives and structures such as White supremacy. These colonial practices are highlighted by research that benefits from exerting authority and enacting an expert position to extract knowledge from marginalized communities without reciprocity and advocacy (Tau, 2023). Further examples of colonization in research and academia include the use of diagnostic criteria, normality, and baseline behaviors informed by White cisgender heterosexual men to pathologize BIPOC communities; there is also the issue of the predominance of Whiteness in academic spaces, including editorial staff in publication journals (Mullan, 2023). Research and academia also play a role in maintaining colonial and oppressive structures by legitimizing oppressive practices under the guise of various savior narratives (Smith, 2021).

A decolonized research approach may include many practices and values, such as critical reflexivity, dialogue, and catalytic validity (Lather, 1986). One example of critical reflexivity is writing a positionality statement, which involves critical reflection on the various domains of our lives in which we have or lack privilege. Dialogue includes conversing on how our identities impact our work and interactions with community members; in doing so, researchers recognize the power dynamic between researcher and co-researcher and try to centralize consent, mutuality, autonomy, respect, care, and relationships. Additionally, catalytic validity refers to the degree to which collaboration with community members energizes, revitalizes, and fosters the development of critical consciousness. This sociopolitical concept involves the ability to identify and analyze oppressive social, economic, and political forces, and to take action to address them (Freire, 1972; Lather, 1986). By emphasizing catalytic validity, researchers are held accountable to the underlying goals of decolonial and liberatory work.

Further examples of decolonial practices in research include advocacy, power sharing, and rituals (Keikelame & Swartz, 2019; Reyes et al., 2024; Zavala, 2013). Research has the potential to serve as a platform to elevate advocacy and support existing grassroots efforts, creating spaces for and by the community (Zavala, 2013). Researchers can also share their findings with stakeholders and others with the power to make systemic changes to create more equitable conditions for marginalized communities. Researchers who intend to work with marginalized communities must also examine the power differentials between researchers and the populations they hope to learn from. Power sharing is an important practice in decolonial research, in which researchers involve community members in various points of the research process and continually consult and check for their consent while encouraging and honoring autonomy (Keikelame & Swartz, 2019). Decolonial research and advocacy efforts can often be very draining; thus, Reyes et al. (2024) recommend engaging in rituals to remain attuned and grounded and to help connect to material more deeply.

The Liberatory Research Collective

We are an innovative and collaborative research collective, dedicated to pushing the bounds of traditional research methodologies by advancing liberatory, anti-oppressive, and decolonial research in the counseling profession. We started as a university research lab, but chose to honor our growth as a collective of folks dedicated to decolonial and anti-oppressive work by operating independently of any institution that might uphold or be influenced by oppressive and colonial structures. We evolved into the Liberatory Research Collective, comprised of scholars, educators, counselors, and community members from across the country. We aim to co-create a space where anyone interested in research, particularly with marginalized communities, can develop the skills needed to engage in transformative and decolonial research. We challenge the status quo and ask critical questions like: 1) Who has the power to design and conduct research? 2) Who are the researchers? and 3) What qualifies them to engage with marginalized and targeted communities?

Demonstration of Decolonized Research Methods in Action

     Our dedication to decolonizing the counseling profession through clinical and research practices is a profound testament to our integrity and purpose. It is a beacon of hope and inspiration, demonstrating how research can be a powerful tool for healing and resistance. One notable example of our impact was a photovoice exhibit, “Through Our Lens: Queer Womxn of Color’s Experiences of Healing and Liberation,” which we curated and hosted in honor of National Coming Out Day (October 11, 2023). This exhibit was part of a photovoice project where we partnered with nine QWoC to explore and celebrate their experiences of healing inside and outside of counseling. The exhibit highlighted and celebrated the diverse ways in which QWoC find healing and resist dominant narratives, both within and beyond the realm of counseling, through the lens of QWoC who beautifully captured their personal stories of resilience and healing, illustrating a narrative often overlooked—a narrative that celebrates their strength and wisdom. We believe this exhibition touched the hearts of all 169 guests and broadened our collective understanding and appreciation for the experiences of QWoC.

This exhibit is an example of our work as researchers committed to pushing the bounds of traditional research methods that have historically oppressed, weaponized, and erased the experiences of marginalized communities. Our work is our love letter to all marginalized communities and an invitation for counselors and counselor educators to practice decolonial and liberatory approaches.

Photovoice Methodology
     Photovoice, introduced by Wang and Burris (1997) and grounded in critical consciousness, feminist theory, and documentary photography, extends Paulo Freire’s (1972) notion that visual images can foster critical community reflection. The objectives of photovoice are to showcase the strengths and concerns of marginalized communities, stimulate dialogue about community issues and strength through group discussions of photographs, and spur engagement in advocacy by reaching policymakers and other key stakeholders (Wang & Burris, 1997). Photovoice invites marginalized groups to articulate their perspectives through photography, fostering autonomy and enabling self-advocacy for political and social reforms that address their communal priorities.

Following this philosophy, our research collective advocates for collaborative partnerships with co-researchers to define and address salient identities and issues affecting them. The term “co-researcher” is used here as an indicator for the individuals or community members who are conducting the research with us. The use of this term is a liberatory and decolonial approach, where the power is held not solely by the researcher but also by the community. We continue to define and redefine the terms queer and womxn of color to connect varying perspectives of these terms that are central to our work. Queer is a term with a harmful history that many within the LGBTQIA2S+ community have reclaimed to define someone who lives outside the margins of the socially constructed confines of romantic, sexual, and gender identity, as well as gender expression (The LGBTQ Community Center of the Desert, n.d.). Some members of the LGBTQIA2S+ community also use the term queer as a political stance. Womxn of color refers to people of the global majority who identify with the socially constructed womxn identity; the “e” in “women” is replaced by an “x” to include transgender, genderqueer, non-binary, genderfluid, gender non-conforming, and/or gender expansive people (Kendall, 2008; McConnell et al., 2016).

Through Our Lens Photovoice Project
     In June 2023, we started recruitment for the photovoice project to find between eight and 15 self-identified QWoC who were willing to actively participate in this project by 1) meeting with researchers to build rapport, discuss their participation in the project, and obtain verbal consent; 2) taking between eight and 15 pictures that represent their experience(s) of healing inside and outside of counseling as a QWoC; 3) completing the Photovoice Reflection Form and Interview Reflection Form, and participating in three meetings (two of which were required and a third which was optional if they were interested in providing researchers with additional feedback); and 4) actively identifying and listing ways to take action and/or advocate and support with the exploration of how we shared the research findings.

2024 Bridging the Gap Symposium Presentation Overview
     Our presentation at the 2024 Bridging the Gap Symposium, titled “Through Our Lens: Exhibiting Decolonized Research and Clinical Practice in Action,” was created as a means to bring our photovoice exhibit to the 2024 NBCCF Symposium while allowing attendees to explore the healing practices of QWoC inside and outside of counseling from a decolonial perspective. By encouraging attendees to explore the experiences of QWoC in our exhibit, we hoped to shed light on how taking a decolonized and liberatory approach to research fosters healing and empowerment for BIPOC co-researchers and researchers. This presentation was intended to showcase the transformative power of decolonized research and provide tangible insights for integrating these practices into counseling. Attendees had the opportunity to engage in a gallery experience and discussions surrounding decolonized research and positionality, as well as how insights gleaned from our partnership with QWoC can be applied to counseling and research practices.

Our Rationale
     Traditional counseling methods often fail to address the unique tapestry of cultural, societal, and personal challenges faced by BIPOC individuals, particularly QWoC (Reyes et al., 2022). By integrating a decolonial framework, counselors can create more inclusive and effective healing environments. Our presentation explored various strategies used by QWoC to navigate their healing journeys, emphasizing the importance of cultural sensitivity, community support, and personal empowerment.

Preparing for Our Presentation
     In preparation for our presentation, our group met in one of our hotel rooms to assemble easels while reflecting on our salient identities, emotions, concerns, and hopes for the session. During this meeting, we practiced our positionality statements and reflected deeply on what it meant to present the healing experiences of nine QWoC when members of our research team had insider and outsider identities related to the QWoC label. We discussed what it meant for some of our White and cisgender male identities to influence the presentation material and potentially impact presentation attendees. For example, my (sixth author Michelle Pollok) reflective process included dialogue with my colleagues on what our privileges mean and how they can serve or harm the communities we work with. Much of this dialogue focused on the process of being a vessel for QWoC to share their creative methods, showcasing their experiences of healing. For me, this was a crucial piece of this project, as I was cognizant of speaking for, or over, our co-researchers, knowing that I do not understand their experience as BIPOC. I spoke with my colleague (fourth author Grace Schroeder) about our Whiteness in relation to this project and our goals of de-centering it while also sharing our queer identities with our co-researchers and reflecting on what that connection means to us.

We also took the time to acknowledge and explore our insider (shared) identities, some of which are Queer, womxn, and BIPOC, through positionality statements, identity work, and dialogue. For example, I (second author Tiffany Perry-Wilson) consist of multiple minoritized, intersecting identities, such as being a Queer cis-woman within the African Diaspora. I share commonalities with our co-researchers who identify as QWoC themselves, but it is important for me to keep in mind that we are not a monolithic group; we are a beautiful mix of diverse beings. This shared identity is undeniable, but our interpretations or the meaning that we provide to our experiences will forever be uniquely ours as individuals. Maintaining this awareness was part of my reflective process to be sure that my understanding did not override the experiences of our co-researchers.

Our conversation also included how our areas of mixed privilege intersect with our work. Although I (first author Jessi Pham) may share identities such as bisexual and Asian American, I often reflect on how my cisgender male identity impacts my interpretation and influence on our work. I question what it means for a cisgender man to present material created alongside QWoC and find it important to draw from shared commonalities while acknowledging when my privilege may stand in the way. I recognize that even with shared and unshared identities, there are experiences that I can only hope to understand through listening and empathy. As my colleagues state above, the identities I share in common with co-researchers are not monoliths, and I am also merely a vessel through which we share our collective and unique experiences.

Additionally, from a mentoring standpoint, I (fifth author and faculty lead Ana Reyes) encouraged us to explore and release colonial and White supremacist ideals regarding how we should “present as professionals” by asking how and from whom we learned to present and how to dress for “conferences, symposiums, or professional events.” The invitation to release internalized colonial and White supremacist ideals empowered us to present in a way that felt authentic to who we are and the co-researchers whose stories and wisdom we were sharing. We stressed the importance of taking a non-expert role, emphasizing that we are merely the vessels of knowledge and information shared by co-researchers.

Materials Used
     Our presentation materials consisted of several poster boards and easels set up in various areas around the room. Each poster board displayed a physical print of a co-researcher’s name, photo, caption, title, and image description. Other materials included pride flag stickers, mini bubble wands, letter-writing materials and envelopes, various crystals and stones, and burlap sacks for attendees to create and take home a blend of herbs with myriad healing properties, including lavender, rose, rosemary, and eucalyptus.

Our Symposium Presentation
     We began our session by sharing our positionality statements, broaching our intersecting identities, and centering our relationships with ourselves, each other, and as presenters in academia. We engaged in dialogue with attendees regarding our intentions as researchers, the presence of Whiteness in decolonized research, and our varying queer identities. Opening our presentation with positionality statements allowed us to set the tone for a conversational presentation style that encouraged people in the room to voice their thoughts, experiences, and takeaways.

Moving further into our session, we presented a set of slides to discuss the origins and rationale of photovoice methodology, provide an overview of our study, share the definitions of various key constructs, and give our recommendations for decolonizing counseling research and practices with QWoC. Although the slides served as a guide for our presentation, the core of our session derived from attendees’ feedback, reflections, and observations. Attendees were given time to explore the exhibit and engage with the poster boards thoughtfully and intentionally. We then opened the floor for further reflections and observations connected to their experience engaging with the exhibit. Overall, attendees discussed their feelings, connections, and impressions of the photos that resonated with them. The debrief also included feedback on our process and approach to research, with many attendees expressing their excitement about decolonized research in action.

Our Positionality
     Because of the nature of how our identities interact with our work, we decided to start our presentation with positionality statements to demonstrate our reflexive process. Having attended presentations at other conferences with introductions very focused on academic and professional achievements, we decided to stray from that structure in hopes of introducing ourselves in a way that felt more authentic, personal, and related to our work. Here are deeply personal positionality statements with which we center our experiences contextualized through our lineal histories and some of the identities that influence our work as researchers, clinicians, and educators.

Jessi Pham. I am a descendant of ancestors who continue to pass down rich cultural values and guidance accompanied by rituals, incense, and offerings. I dedicate my educational privileges to their sacrifices and perseverance. My experiences as a queer/bisexual, second-generation Chinese/Vietnamese cisgender man underscore my research approach.

Tiffany Perry-Wilson. I am a descendant of powerful and resilient peoples stolen from their lands consisting of wealth, melanated skin tones, and storytelling. Their sacrifice then and now is the foundation of my existence. My experiences as a QWoC within the African Diaspora roots and guides my comprehension and approach to research and clinical work.

Kevlyn Holmes. I am descended from people I do not know and because of this, I often feel unmoored. In my journey to connect to the parts of myself that have been lost to White supremacy culture, I’ve found I am making peace with and understanding words such as White, genderqueer, White woman, disabled, and demisexual. These parts and the desire to learn from the harm of my White ancestors drive my work. I strive to listen and honor every story I witness.

Grace Schroeder. I am the descendant of fierce and strong-headed advocates. I am also a mound of clay, shaped by the hands of my colleagues, co-researchers, and the various folx who share their stories and perspectives with me. My experiences as a White queer womxn underscore the need for me to serve as a platform in which I uplift BIPOC, providing context to how I approach my research and counseling theories.

Ana Reyes. I am a descendant of wise ones who, against all odds, survived and passed down their wisdom. My experiences as a queer, non-binary femme and a child of [un]documented immigrants of Afro-Latinx and Indigenous roots underscore my anti-oppressive and decolonial approach to research, counseling, and teaching.

Michelle Pollok. I am a descendant of strong womxn who walked against the grain, paving the path before me and instilling a sense of justice. As a White, cisgender researcher, I serve solely as a vessel for these unique stories of reclamation and healing.

In sharing these individualized positionality statements, we seek to honor the progression of our lineages and how they interact with the colonial and oppressive systems around us. These declarations are not just personal narratives but also critical reflections that guide our work. They illuminate the diverse perspectives and experiences that shape our collective approach, fostering a deeper understanding and commitment to anti-oppressive and decolonial methodologies. Through this practice, we aimed to co-create a space at the 2024 Bridging the Gap Symposium that acknowledged and respected the complexities of our identities, encouraging others to reflect on their own positionalities and the impact these have on their work and interactions.

The Healing Experiences and Responses of Our Attendees
     Our attendees shared many insights with us, ranging from their connection with the material to the impact of our session. We are grateful that our intention behind various aspects of our presentation (i.e., introducing ourselves with our positionality statement and then leading with the exhibit) created an environment where attendees were willing to share their thoughts and critiques. One participant shared their hesitation toward attending our presentation on QWoC because the main presenters were White individuals who would be speaking about the experiences of QWoC; after hearing our introductions, they noted feeling more comfortable openly sharing their hesitation because of how we positioned ourselves in this work. This comment reified the importance of our critical reflexivity and our ongoing commitment to exploring how our identities impact our work. Another participant shared their connection to the first author, who introduced himself as a bisexual person—she revealed that, as someone who has experienced biphobia and bi-erasure, she felt seen and validated by the representation of the bisexual identity. Our introductions, one simple (yet powerful) portion of our presentation, impacted the flow of the presentation in a way that highlighted the importance of reflection and identity work in the realm of research, academia, and professional spaces. Coming into this symposium, we intended to build community and encourage collaboration, and by the end of our presentation, we felt very connected to the people in the room with us.

In discussing our presentation, we reflect with profound gratitude on the opportunity to present research we are passionate about with receptive and introspective attendees. Bearing witness to how attendees opened up and engaged with our presentation and research was incredibly rewarding for all of us. The way attendees embraced our decolonial approach and committed to engaging in vulnerable discussions underscored the importance of co-creating spaces where diverse voices are not only heard but celebrated. This experience reaffirmed that community is everything; it is the cornerstone of healing, growth, and social transformation. The interactions and connections formed left us feeling deeply nourished and inspired, reminding us of the transformative power of collective engagement and support.

We were reaffirmed that positioning ourselves authentically helps create a genuine connection with session attendees. The feedback we received highlighted the importance of showing up authentically and continually questioning how we show up in historically White spaces, reinforcing our commitment to decolonial work. Our experience is a testament to the critical role of introspection, camaraderie, and humility in the way we navigate academic, counseling, and healing spaces. There is significant power in showing up as we are and engaging in vulnerable conversations in academic settings such as presentations, knowing that someone in the audience will resonate with our authentic selves. These lessons will guide us in our ongoing journey to foster inclusive and transformative spaces.

Throughout this journey, we experienced a whirlwind of emotions—fright and excitement intertwined as we prepared and presented our work—yet the love and support we provided each other created a foundation of strength and dependability, allowing us to face our fears with courage. The process was filled with joy, gratitude, and excitement, moments of laughter and even tears, as we shared our feelings and experiences, allowing us to connect on a deep level. We were inspired by the courage to challenge existing systems, driven by our shared commitment to decolonial work and the belief that our authentic presence could inspire change. These feelings collectively enriched our experience and solidified our bond as a team. We hope that session attendees left feeling as enriched and nourished as we did and that, as a reader, you are inspired by this article to engage in critical reflection and decolonial practices.

Considerations for Counselor Educators and Researchers

     Implementing decolonial practices in research can be challenging because of existing structures and systems that perpetuate colonized, oppressive, and racist ideologies. These norms have inevitably penetrated academia, clinical practice, and research methodologies, making the task daunting (Goodman et al., 2015). However, with commitment, intentionality, and a willingness to alter internalized theoretical and methodological frameworks, counselor educators (CEs) and researchers can integrate decolonial practices into their respective fields. Applying decolonial practices within academia and research involves significant challenges, necessitating unwavering dedication. This practice requires replacing previously used colonized methods, systems, and structures with decolonial ideologies and practices (Castañeda-Sound et al., 2024; Fish & Gone, 2024; Neville et al., 2024; Quinless, 2022; Tate et al., 2016).

Although this process involves de-centering the self and stepping away from traditional pedagogical approaches, CEs and researchers should build self-awareness through critical reflexivity. This lifelong commitment pairs well with the radical decolonization of oneself, academia, and research approaches. Critical reflexivity is a collaborative practice that involves internal work by CEs and participation from students and colleagues. For instance, Goodman et al. (2015) discussed that providing mentorship and supervision to incoming and current CEs assists in fostering a collaborative approach to critical reflexivity or critical consciousness. This could involve weekly and monthly required meetings to provide support and communal engagement in the self-reflective process. Collective commitment to decolonialize shifts from individualism to collectivism, prioritizing community, and holding each CE accountable within their critical reflexivity process.

Critical reflexivity is best done with an intentional approach. Purposeful selection of course materials, construction of syllabi, and application of research methodologies embedded with decolonized approaches, ideologies, and concepts exemplify intentionality (Castañeda-Sound et al., 2024; Fish & Gone, 2024; Goodman et al., 2015; Neville et al., 2024; Quinless, 2022; Tate et al., 2016). Intentional application of critical reflexivity was evident in our collaborative discussions while preparing for our presentation, where we practiced vulnerability by discussing our fears and worries and how our positionalities inevitably influence how we show up in academic spaces. Challenging inherently colonized frameworks requires commitment and intentionality in dismantling oppressive norms perpetuated in the counseling profession.

Counseling and counselor education programs are part of power structures and systems that contribute to continued inequities, oppression, and colonialism (Castañeda-Sound et al., 2024; Goodman et al., 2015; Shin, 2016). Goodman et al. (2015) emphasized the value of decolonizing traditional pedagogies within counselor education by applying tenets of liberation psychology, such as critical consciousness. They discussed how practices like the banking concept perpetuate colonialism in counselor education programs. This concept positions educators as the sole source of knowledge, depositing it into students, thus maintaining power imbalances and stifling independent thinking and questioning. Consequently, students are not empowered and are forced to rely on the professor, with their perspectives viewed as inadequate if they do not align with Westernized frameworks. The banking concept also applies to research settings, where researchers are seen as the sole providers of knowledge and considered experts on the lived experiences of the populations they study, which can be problematic (Goodman et al., 2015) and often supports the continued use of extractive research methodologies.

Cultivating a space of community and shared learning can nourish not only the students and co-researchers but also the CEs and researchers themselves. By approaching education and research with humility and openness to learning without assuming expertise, the likelihood of causing harm to the communities that we serve significantly diminishes.

Conclusion

Our photovoice exhibit and presentation at the 2024 NBCCF Bridging the Gap Symposium provided session attendees and us with a unique platform to share and reflect on the healing experiences of nine QWoC. By utilizing photovoice methodology in our research and grounding our approach in decolonial and liberatory principles, we were able to conduct and present research in a way that represented the diverse narratives of our co-researchers authentically.

Our work moves away from traditional deficit-based research that often reduces minoritized communities to the wounded subject position (Brown, 1995), thus diminishing queer people of color to their experiences of trauma and oppression. Instead, we focus on the strengths, resilience, and healing processes of QWoC. This shift is informed by intersectionality theory, decolonial scholarship, and participatory action research, inviting us to center the voices and experiences of our co-researchers in a meaningful, empathetic, and socially just manner.

Our presentation at the Bridging the Gap Symposium was not just a display of research findings but a call to action for counselors, researchers, and CEs alike to integrate decolonial practices into counseling and academia. Through an interactive gallery experience and open dialogue, we demonstrated how decolonial and liberatory research methodologies can foster empowerment and healing for all involved in the research process, including those who witness or read the findings. The feedback and reflections from attendees brought focus to the importance of co-creating spaces where diverse voices are heard, honored, and celebrated.

Implementing decolonial practices in research and counseling requires a commitment to self-examination, camaraderie, and humility. It involves challenging existing power structures and embracing authentic connections with the communities we interact with as counseling scholars and fellow human beings. As CEs and researchers, we must continually question how our identities and positionalities influence our work and strive to create inclusive, validating, and supportive environments for all. Our experience at the symposium reaffirmed the transformative power of community and collective engagement. The support and courage we found in each other allowed us to face our fears and present our work with pride.

In conclusion, this photovoice project and our subsequent presentation have not only enriched our understanding of healing experiences but also strengthened our resolve to continue engaging in decolonial and liberatory research. We hope that our work inspires others to embrace these methodologies, challenge oppressive systems, and support the healing and empowerment of minoritized communities.

 

Conflict of Interest and Funding Disclosure
The authors reported no conflict of interest
or funding contributions for the development
of this manuscript.

 

References

American Psychological Association. (2021). Historical chronology: Examining psychology’s contributions to the belief in racial hierarchy and perpetuation of inequality for people of color in U.S. https://www.apa.org/about/apa/addressing-racism/historical-chronology

Auguste, E., Bowdring, M., Kasparek, S. W., McPhee, J., Tabachnick, A. R., Tung, I., & Galán, C. A. (2023). Psychology’s contributions to anti-blackness in the United States within psychological research, criminal justice, and mental health. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(6), 1282–1305. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221141374

Brown, W. (1995). States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton University Press.

Castañeda-Sound, C. L., Gallardo, M., & Salgado, S. O. (2024). Unlearning colonial practices and (re)envisioning graduate education in psychology. In L. Comas-Díaz, H. Y. Adames, & N. Y. Chavez-Dueñas (Eds.), Decolonial psychology: Toward anticolonial theories, research, training, and practice (pp. 219–246). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000376-010

Fish, J., & Gone, J. P. (2024). Beyond decolonization: Anticolonial methodologies for indigenous futurity in psychological research. In L. Comas-Díaz, H. Y. Adames, & N. Y. Chavez-Dueñas (Eds.), Decolonial psychology: Toward anticolonial theories, research, training, and practice (pp. 119–141). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000376-006

Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Books.

Ginicola, M. M., Smith, C., & Filmore, J. M. (Eds.). (2017). Affirmative counseling with LGBTQI+ people. American Counseling Association.

Goodman, R. D., Williams, J. M., Chung, R. C.-Y., Talleyrand, R. M., Douglass, A. M., McMahon, H. G., & Bemak, F. (2015). Decolonizing traditional pedagogies and practices in counseling and psychology education: A move towards social justice and action. In R. D. Goodman & P. C. Gorski, Decolonizing “multicultural” counseling through social justice (pp. 147–162). Springer.

Hudson, K. D., & Romanelli, M. (2020). “We are powerful people”: Health-promoting strengths of LGBTQ communities of color. Qualitative Health Research, 30(8), 1156–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319837572

Keikelame, M. J., & Swartz, L. (2019). Decolonising research methodologies: Lessons from a qualitative research project, Cape Town, South Africa. Global Health Action, 12(1), Article 1561175. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1561175

Kendall, L. J. (2008). The Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival: An Amazon matrix of meaning (2nd ed.). The Spiral Womyn’s Press.

Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807017

Lee, C. C., & Boykins, M. (2022). Racism as a mental health challenge: An antiracist counselling perspective. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 63(4), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000350

The LGBTQ Community Center of the Desert. (n.d.). What does “Queer” mean? Why are younger generations reclaiming the word Queer? https://thecentercv.org/es/blog/what-does-queer-mean-why-are-younger-generations-reclaiming-the-word-queer

McConnell, E. A., Odahl-Ruan, C. A., Kozlowski, C., Shattell, M., & Todd, N. R. (2016). Trans women and Michfest: An ethnophenomenology of attendees’ experiences. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 20(1), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2015.1076234

Mullan, J. (2023). Decolonizing therapy: Oppression, historical trauma, and politicizing your practice. W. W. Norton.

Neville, H. A., Lee, A., & Maghsoodi, A. H. (2024). Decolonizing and building liberatory psychological sciences. In L. Comas-Díaz, H. Y. Adames, & N. Y. Chavez-Dueñas (Eds.), Decolonial psychology: Toward anticolonial theories, research, training, and practice (pp. 89–118). American Psychological Association.

Quinless, J. M. (2022). Decolonizing data: Unsettling conversations about social research methods. University of Toronto Press.

Reyes, A. G., Capraro, A. E., & Rodríguez Delgado, M. (2024). Co-creando rituales / co-creating rituals to hold our work as anti-oppressive counselors and researchers. The Qualitative Report29(4), 1085–1102. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6987

Reyes, A. G., Lindo, N. A., Allen, N., & Rodríguez Deldago, M. (2022). Centralizing the voices of queer womxn of color in counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 100(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12417

Shin, R. Q. (2016). The application of critical consciousness and intersectionality as tools for decolonizing racial/ethnic identity development models in the field of counseling and psychology. In R. D. Goodman & P. C. Gorski (Eds.), Decolonizing “multicultural” counseling through social justice (pp. 11–20). Springer.

Singh, A., Estevez, R. I., & Truszczynski, N. (2021). LGBTQ+ people and discrimination: What we have and continue to face in the fight for our lives. In K. L. Nadal & M. R. Scharrón-del Río (Eds.), Queer psychology (pp. 119–137). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74146-4_7

Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (3rd ed.). Zed Books.

Tate, K. A., Torres Rivera, E., & Edwards, L. M. (2016). Colonialism and multicultural counseling competence research: A liberatory analysis. In R. D. Goodman & P. C. Gorski (Eds.), Decolonizing “multicultural” counseling through social justice (pp. 41–54). Springer.

Tau, Z. (2023). Liberatory research [e-course]. https://www.liberatoryresearch.com/e-course

Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309

Zavala, M. (2013). What do we mean by decolonizing research strategies? Lessons from decolonizing, indigenous research projects in New Zealand and Latin America. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2(1), 55–71.

 

Jessi Pham, BA, is a master’s student at California State University, Fullerton. Tiffany Perry-Wilson, MA, NCC, LPC, is a doctoral candidate at George Washington University and a licensed professional counselor at Psychological & Life Skills Associates. Kevlyn Holmes, BS, is a master’s student at California State University, Fullerton. Grace Schroeder, BA, is a master’s student at California State University, Fullerton. Ana Reyes, PhD, NCC, LPC, CHST, is a core faculty member at Antioch University. Michelle Pollok, BA, is a master’s student at California State University, Fullerton. Correspondence may be addressed to Jessi Pham, 800 N. State College Blvd EC-405, Fullerton, CA 92831, jessihp@csu.fullerton.edu.

Appendix

Recommendations for Self-Directed Learning

Counselor educators can familiarize themselves with liberatory, decolonial, participatory, and action-focused research methodologies that intentionally decentralize their role as researchers and encourage students to do the same. We suggest the following resources to support counselor educators on their journey:

Books

  • Decolonizing Epistemologies: Latina/o Theology and Philosophy (1st ) by Ada Maria
    Isasi-Dias and Eduardo Mendieta
  • Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples by Linda Tuhiwai Smith
  • Photovoice Research in Education and Beyond: A Practice Guide from Theory to Exhibition
    by Amanda O. Latz
  • Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods by Shawn Wilson
  • Research as Resistance: Revisiting Critical, Indigenous, and Anti-oppressive Approaches
    (2nd ed.) by Leslie Brown

Websites